What's more sad is she actually was giving 50% of her fees to a charity
More like she was acutally "guilt-tripping" 50% of her fees to a Charity.
What's more sad is she actually was giving 50% of her fees to a charity
What a fucking disgrace. According to the SEC complaint, Karen's fund pays the incentives to the fund manager based on realized gains, and unrealized losses are basically ignored. With that kind of incentive structure, any monkey can be a super star manager. You perpetually roll your losing positions over to the next contract, thus indefinitely postponing the realized losses, and get regularly paid on the realized gains. That's a totally genius scheme, and yes, a fraudulent one.
Seems like every time we hear about an extraordinary market performer, he or she turns out to be a common financial fraud/thief.
Once the blow up happened it became 100% ponzi:
What I'm trying to get my head around is that in the Tasty Trade interviews, Sosnoff talks about how he used to monitor Karen's positions/ risk- Just like they do with all clients( I assume under TOS) . So if Sos and the TD family knew what was going on, why did they put her on a pedestal and ramp her so hard via Tasty Trade? Even if Sos didn't know directly, surley someone in the family knew what was going on?