Scalping_My Way with ACV

How is it that sellers stop a down trend by selling more. I dont understand that. Then he stats later on that their are still more sellers to get the up trend started. That makes no sense. Could someon explain this? Does anyone know? Does that guy that posted the Dom pictures know? This is the exact opposite of what is should be. But if that is the case. In order to start an uptrend wouldn't their not be more buyers than sellers.

So to stop a down trend we Sell.
To start an uptrend we Sell.

That's what this says. Now I'm sure he has somethign in mind. But could someone fill in the pieces where he didn't. I'd sure appreciate it, because I cant get anyone to explain this to me. I'm starting to think know one knows.
 
Quote from Trusten:

How is it that sellers stop a down trend by selling more. I dont understand that. Then he stats later on that their are still more sellers to get the up trend started. That makes no sense. Could someon explain this? Does anyone know? Does that guy that posted the Dom pictures know? This is the exact opposite of what is should be. But if that is the case. In order to start an uptrend wouldn't their not be more buyers than sellers.

So to stop a down trend we Sell.
To start an uptrend we Sell.

That's what this says. Now I'm sure he has somethign in mind. But could someone fill in the pieces where he didn't. I'd sure appreciate it, because I cant get anyone to explain this to me. I'm starting to think know one knows.

IMHO, part of the story -

What you are seeing in the order book are orders - not trades. Suppose the market is rising and buyers perceive this. Buyers will tend to submit marketable orders which are not visible in the DOM, but nevertheless do result in trades. If you believe the market is rising, and you want in, there is not a lot of point in submitting a limit order below last traded price. Sellers, on the other hand believing the market to be rising will submit limit orders above the last traded price and let price come to them.

ie in a rising market, the sellers tend to be more passive and submit non-marketable limit orders, and the buyers tend to be more agressive and submit marketable orders (market or limit).

Reverse the logic for a falling market.

What you see in the DOM reflects somewhat the agressiveness of the buyers and sellers. More asks that bids ~ buyers are more agressive. More bids than asks ~ sellers are more agressive.

Of course this generalisation, but it seems to me there is some truth in it.
 
Quote from Trader28Lite:
in that situation there is always more bid size in an uptrend and more ask size in a downtrend... [/B]

Really ?, then look at todays SPI. For the great majority of the downtrend size is on the BID
 

Attachments

Quote from dcraig:

Really ?, then look at todays SPI. For the great majority of the downtrend size is on the BID

I'm talking about a specific trading signal... if you want to discuss the other 95% of the time you would not take a trade then I'm sure you can build a case for either scenario... I much prefer making money
 
Quote from jack hershey:

This is a good thread to learn about several things:

How the market works(moves).

How to trade to make a lot of money.

How some people who trade limit their performance by being "right".

How several of the four major games that "show" are being played.

How some people misunderstand what is going on an act upon it.

Here and in other threads on SPM and "order flow" there are some good illustrations. what makes the illustrations good is that they are there to see.

Unfortunately there is not much discussion beyond advanced beginner anywhere up to this point.

If you want to learn about how markets work by watching, it is important to be able to see the markets.

It is a slow process to grasp makrets and their operation and it is best to start with beginner stuff and then gradually overlay it with additional supporting sensory phenomena displays.

If a person cannot get the fundamentals down first, then he generally rebels at going any further and is stuck out on the branch for a long time.

Markets do not operate as gaming enterprises, they are much more serious and purposeful. Strategies abound. In gaming, a person knows the rules and gets dealt a hand. In markets, there are no rules and everyone gets dealt the same hand. This is difficult for most traders to understand until they get to intermediate or advanced intermediate levels.

A big influence on traders is how much money they have. The more money you have, the more important it becomes to make money with a comparable strategy.

The DOM is a tool that is part of strategies and it is used in a variety of ways, often according to the skills of the trader.

One example. It is a sort of "fix" for the OP of SPM.

The depth of market (DOM) alone is insufficient to tell the whole story. You have to code it with other data to make it understandable and automatic.

The companion is T&S. Why is this? The reason is that you have to take into account those who do not "show" on T&S. It is importantto know why these people are not showing. It comes down to the srategy of the traders. Some strategies are based on price others are based on timing. "Timers" do not show because they do not have to.

There are four basic games played by those who show. Their strategies are known far and wide by "timers" and they are "played" by timers.

Lets put DOM and T&S together and see how this is like going from the first gear of "simple" to Second and Drive gears of making money.

The manual version is very doable as well.

There are two components, as mentioned: DOM and T&S.

We have "tape reading" oriented flow display now available.

Personnally, I use a leading indicaor of this stuff so I am just seeing the combo give me more the magnitude of the vector and the limits of the moves.

So four showing games are going on and the "smart money" does not show until it plays a card. I truncate the T&S because I only want to see the "rich smart money". and how i affects the DOM since it is on the oppositie side of the "show" on the DOM.

Ask yourself how Jak Broz misses this. Then ask how important is it to the balance of things.

First gear makes so much mony; second gear makes more money; smart money is making a little more and is restrained to only parts of the day; rich smart money knows a lot more and is making correspondingly more; the Drive level players are pulling the money out of the pool.

The money velocity comes in about 6 levels and the DOM and T&S do not tell you what the money velocity is. That is found elsewhere and not part of simple nor what is showing.

So what is the DOM and T&S telling you? It tells you the two parts of the P, V relation: continuation and change.

Why doesn't Jack Broz get this differentiation. Why doesn't the ratio measure work for this.

Let's skip the answer of "being right" is more important than making money. Lets skip the "I make enough looking at this or that way.

The gaming paradigm dominates and it is "showing" 100% of the time. The numbers that you see showing relate to what gaming major principle always in play by marginal and slightly better traders? Skip the losers here.

Think about it. whch of the four major games is "showing" and caused by low grade player traders?

Protection is "showing".

At what quality level of trader who is successful does protection stop showing?

I track 12 forms of strategies for doing stops. They ALL show.

Protection is not going to get a "play" as the market moves except when? That is when is the only time protection is affected when the market is moving. Why did Jack Broz type this movement in in his litany and not discuss its occurrance?

Looks like we have reached a point to discuss learning how to make money by using some displays on the screen.

I called four trades in live trading in Vegas using what is below. the presenters and I made an agreement after the presentation. I get camtasias daily from them by email as a courtesy atthis point.

They had DOM displayed and were not using it to make trades on the market movement turns.

What is the DOM doing that is so terrific when it is coupled to the T&S?

It is a leading indicator of price turns.

Does anyone know why this is not mentioned by anyone who is published or is on the web in behalf of the market places?

It is a secret apparently.

Lets get down on this right now.


Take a display of DOM in the form of a button and run along side it the TS tape, truncated at a good level.

hang stalactites for the contract volume values going away from the middle outward. (bid on left offer on right).

You are now viewing the range of the next move and the limits of the move and the direction the move is going in.

You are also seeing the strength of the move (market pace) and the sentiment of the market as well.

I have a vocabulary for this and I will not lay it out now. It is unique ad the descriptors are functional names that "associate" to what is going on.

Here you get to call trades to the tick. That is what impresses presenters, too.

What does making money look like when you get to this level of market display and understanding?

Let me explain.

MOST PEOPLE HAVE NEVER SEEN THE MARKET AS YET.

I use the word "WALL" to describe the tick value of the reversal action that will be taken when the time comes to NOW.

When a person says he prefers trading position over daytrading to make money, he is saying he cannot time the market and s is capable of proving he can't time.

When a person is trading using the DOM and T&S to get reversals down to a tick level, he is saying he day trades, is leveraged, is trading the max contracts that, at that time, the market can bear and he is absolutely front running the rich smart money all day long for 6 1/2 hours of the RMH.

Look at the T&S and truncate it so that you see the T&S "move" when the players are playing and the chicken feed is not there to even look at. Watch the DOM and see the WALL.

See the WALL form; see the wall recede as the movement begin after the turn;see the next reversal appreamintues ahead of the nextturn; see the BS scalping miss the oppotunities. See the difference between protection and the "no show" traders who are opposite ALL shows.

Get to see how the MINORITY controls the market. See how the MINORITY is running the plays on the market flow.

Make absolutley sure at some point that you learn to separate the BS and mediocracy out of what you read, think and believe.

First you have to get to see the market as a display on your sceen (No one is doing that so far as far as snagt are concerned).

Second, you have to truncate out what is not important.

Third, you have to learn that the trades that count do not show until after the tade AND you have to know that what is showing is PROTECTION for people who are margial and hardly successful in trading.

Fourth, it is nice to kno the three other games being played on the DOM; they are all apparant if you have any retention and can see multicontracts migrating.

We now have global real time market data in many degrees of freedom. at this point the market telegraphs to those that have the displays setup to see it. There is no platform that iscomprehensive. It take 3 or 4 and then you have to code the data to SEE THE MARKET.

Do not even imagine that anyone has ever backtested anything that has to do with making money on the markets.

Get it straight as soon as possible that the "regression to the mean" is not where money is made based upon price change.

Money is made in the markets by continually being in the markets and by carving off the turns and carving them to the tick using leading indicators of price.

you never found your way to reality
 
Interesting discussion. I'm quite new to this so I have not observed the DOM in all market conditions. There does seem to be a lot of confusion about what the DOM shows, however.

Price moves due to imbalances in supply and demand (does anyone disagree with that basic premise?).

As I understand it, the DOM shows the supply of passive limit orders hoping to get hit whereas demand is made up of undisclosed (on the DOM at least) market orders. T&S shows actual executed demand. The minority has control means that when there is a shortage of something the price moves in their favour - e.g. when the market orders to buy dry up price will have to adjust down to entice them back just as the market orders to sell start hitting the other side.

One thing that is not clear to me and I hope someone can enlighten me: when the price "translates" on the DOM (say it is going up) where do the new limit order best bids come from? They appear instantly. If they were already there, wouldn't they have been executed before price moved up?

Maybe Im being dense, as I said I'm new to this stuff.
 
>> "Price moves due to imbalances in supply and demand ..."

Instead, price may move to where buyers/sellers perceive that there is good value.

In futures there may be an almost unlimited supply of contracts. A new contract is created every time someone opens a short position of one contract.
 
Quote from doli:

>> "Price moves due to imbalances in supply and demand ..."

Instead, price may move to where buyers/sellers perceive that there is good value...

Actually, price moves because supply on one side has run out whilst there is new demand for the same side. Consider the following super simple case

ASK PRICE||ASK SIZE: 1450.00||50
ASK PRICE||ASK SIZE: 1449.50||40
ASK PRICE||ASK SIZE: 1449.25||20
ASK PRICE||ASK SIZE: 1449.00||10
1448.75||10:BID PRICE||BID SIZE
1448.50||20:BID PRICE||BID SIZE
1448.25||30:BID PRICE||BID SIZE
1448.00||40:BID PRICE||BID SIZE
1447.75||40:BID PRICE||BID SIZE

I MKT ORDER BUY 10 contracts...
The DOM then becomes

ASK PRICE||ASK SIZE: 1450.00||50
ASK PRICE||ASK SIZE: 1449.50||40
ASK PRICE||ASK SIZE: 1449.25||20
ASK PRICE||ASK SIZE: 1449.00||0
1448.75||10:BID PRICE||BID SIZE
1448.50||20:BID PRICE||BID SIZE
1448.25||30:BID PRICE||BID SIZE
1448.00||40:BID PRICE||BID SIZE
1447.75||40:BID PRICE||BID SIZE

As long as no one else places a LIMIT SELL ORDER at ASK (ie. 1449.00), the next MKT BUY ORDER will be transacted at 1449.25. This is the fundamentals of the DOM. You only have a PRICE CHANGE once AVAILABILITY (ie. SIZE) has run out. The new orders that fall in to the BID SIDE of 1449.00 occur because they are triggerred by other users and other forms of LIMIT STOPS etc... It is very important to sort out the SUPPLY/DEMAND is on two fronts. There is going to be DEMAND to SHORT against the SUPPLY of SHORTS, as well as DEMAND to LONG against the SUPPLY of LONGS. The desired analytics which all platforms have screwed up needs to assess/incorporate the following four INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS...

SHORT DEMAND, SHORT SUPPLY, LONG DEMAND, LONG SUPPLY

The DOM is incomplete because it only shows you 2 of these components. The other 2 are on the T&S. The corrected equation of these FOUR INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS gives the right picture (ie. the one that work$ without fail)...

Regards,
MAK
 
Thanks MAK - I was beginning to regret posting.

Quote from makosgu:

Actually, price moves because a particular supply has run out.

Yes. What I was getting at above is that if the demand for longs falls, supply of shorts will begin to run out.

The new orders that fall in to the BID SIDE of 1349.00 occur because they are triggerred by other users and other forms of LIMIT STOPS etc...

This is the bit I still don't understand - is the exchange holding the orders back, so they appear on the DOM as limit orders once price moves? What is the motivation for this order type? If I'm bidding to buy at 1349.00 why didn't I place the market order when the offer was still 1349.00 moments earlier?

It is very important to sort out the SUPPLY/DEMAND is on two fronts. There is going to be DEMAND to SHORT against the SUPPLY of SHORTS, as well as DEMAND to LONG against the SUPPLY of LONGS.

Yes, I've figured this out. From what I read few understand this dynamic.

Supply (liquidity) = limit orders on the DOM.
Demand = market orders.

Market orders hit the best available limit orders on the DOM; limit orders only get executed if a market order hits it. The list of limit orders on the DOM tells you little about the demand. The change in the limit orders on the DOM, as confirmed by T&S does tell you about demand.
 
Back
Top