This seems to conflict with a tight risk management strategy? I have trouble considering averaging down a risk management strategy. Am I missing something?
This is where backtesting comes into play. Any entry is not risk management. I am not risking same amount as original entry but targets are same as entry, so risking less to get more. So if original entry was Long 4695.50 PS 4691.50, 2nd entry 4694 PS 4691.25 & 3rd 4692.5 PS 4690.75 all with same target 4697.50
My winning/breakeven percentages last month in ES 86%/ 8% manually, 1,218 regular entries. I missed parts of days cause fatigue/fevers/etc. Two automated scalping systems still going are 24 hours a day and limited to one trade an hour per instrument, "pigs get slaughtered", don't wish to be greedy. 4 Energies/3 Indexes and other is Forex. Energies still decent markets without having to risk hugely.
That is just an anomaly of statistics. Successful scalpers can have low win rates. It's just the basal math that matters?
Are you writing about day traders? They can have lower win rates, but if a scalper is cracking out 60 plus trades a day and risk is much more than targets. If I was doing 70% wins/BE, I be losing for the month between losses, commissions, etc... on system am manually trading.
"Physical wellbeing (risk) is equal to all other styles of trading."
In my case, scalping definitely was wrong avenue to take, beside 12 surgeries between 2008 and 2020 and two this year with one to go in December, carpal tunnel both hands. No heart problems, off 4 meds for high BP, not diabetic....
I have zero concerns of long term trading, scalping is more of frustrations of getting filled on targets.
Maybe ten years ago I posted to forum live, gave dozen entries/PS/target ahead of time, even put on a ES trade just before gov't report and hedged, lost a couple overall. But it is really too too difficult, have to stay 100% focused instead of typing.