"Scaling out" is inferior behavior

Do you scale out of positions?

  • I always scale out

    Votes: 113 14.1%
  • I scale out most of the time

    Votes: 228 28.5%
  • Most of the time, I do not scale out

    Votes: 189 23.6%
  • I never scale out

    Votes: 270 33.8%

  • Total voters
    800
The only "absolut-ism "of the market is there is NO absolutism which puts a serious dent in the OP's opening statement.....

I would futher counter the OP's logic by asking if he blindly reverses his position upon liquidation.Considering that he is 100% sure that it is optimal to liquidate 100% upon a target/signal,it would imply that one should reverse direction at that point.
 
Quote from BlindLemonBoosh:

Er, no. You should probably try reading the "Mr. Quant" post again. There is no such thing as a "target" in his trading methodology. In fact, he had achieved the original expectancy (and then some) and still had a forward-looking positive expectancy remaining.


You have just stated that Mr Quant is not using targets therefore the answer is very simple since it is how I do the bulk of my trading. -- He stays in the trade until the previous reaction low stops him out. He stays in with full position. --Really quite simple--Succesful trading is. :)
 
Quote from volente_00:

Which would you rather be ? A 75% trader who hits 2-4 points consistently multiple times intraday? Or a 30% swing trader who nets 20-30 points but must wait long periods for each trade to mature ? If you have a profit target there is nothing wrong with waiting for it to get hit but it really depends on your current win rate. I have noticed in your ES trades you often take quite a bit of heat, such as the past one that went 40 points against you before reversing. It is obvious that this ES trading makes up such a small % of your portfolio that it allows you to use such wide stops.

Vol, the discussion of whether position or day trading is better is not the subject of this thread. It's a great discussion, but is not relevant within these margins. :)
 
Quote from kiwi_trader:

There are trends ... there aren't
Scaling in works ... it doesn't
Scaling out works ... it doesn't
We predict .. we don't




Does scaling in and out work? Certainly


Is it inferior to not scaling in and out? Absolutely
 
Quote from version77:

Since the word "inferior" is used in the thread title, I assume that
someone with a superiority complex wrote it and is trying his best
to remain superior with his hypothesis...:p


I am not personally superior. I assert that I use a superior way of trading.
 
Quote from taowave:

The only "absolut-ism "of the market is there is NO absolutism which puts a serious dent in the OP's opening statement.....


No sir-- This most definitely an area that is absolute. The math does not lie.
 
Quote from taowave:

I would futher counter the OP's logic by asking if he blindly reverses his position upon liquidation.Considering that he is 100% sure that it is optimal to liquidate 100% upon a target/signal,it would imply that one should reverse direction at that point.

I didn't used to think so, but now I do. You should always be in the market and the only time you would take your money off the table is when you think there is a reversal--otherwise why take any off?
 
Quote from Buy1Sell2:

otherwise why take any off?

When I was a kid my grandma always told me if someone comes
around passing out cookies to take some before they are all gone...:)
 
Back
Top