Quote from Buy1Sell2:
No the ultimate profit target was 18 as you indicated in the second part of the example.
Quote from thenewguy:
No, the profit target was 9 points and I put a trailing stop on the rest. You are basically arguing that if you scale out before the ultimate high of the trade, it's inferior. I agree with that!
TNG
Quote from cashmoney69:
Buy1, I ment to ask you. When you say you "let your winners run", does that mean you hold through a fed meeting, or earnings, or any other market condition that could really f--k you over?... a perfect example is TZOO on daily charts.
Like I said before, I dont scale out, but one should exit BEFORE the inevitable happens.
cm69
Quote from Buy1Sell2:
What you did was scale out at 9 points which was half the position. You are in agreement with me. The math says it all. My point is that if your profit target is 9--let it run to 9 . If your profit target is 18 , let it run to 18. If you are using a trailing stop, you are better off letting the whole trade run to get stopped out by the trailing stop rathe than scaing out. That's the whole point.
Quote from thenewguy:
Right, i am in agreement there. Then what I did is let half the trade run farther than it would have if i sold it all at 9. exiting all at once would have made you less money than scaling out. simple as that. you keep arguing that if you scale out, your profit target is too low if the trade went higher. I'm not really sure how else to put this, but you are totally missing my point.
TNG
Quote from Buy1Sell2:
Each trader defines his profit taking point. Regardless of whether or not that profit taking point is wrong has nothing to do with it. You come out better by not scaling out. The idea of letting the trade run with trailing stops, which is what I do in general, is an entirely different subject.