Which debate is that? If you want to debate whether AGW is real or not I will laugh at you and call you names. Yes. Because anyone who takes that position is an idiot. Period. If you want to discuss the finer aspects of it I am all ears.
Say goodbye to barrier beaches and coastal salt marshes
- Thread starter futurecurrents
- Start date
Which debate is that? If you want to debate whether AGW is real or not I will laugh at you and call you names. Yes. Because anyone who takes that position is an idiot. Period. If you want to discuss the finer aspects of it I am all ears.
There is significant doubt that AGW exists to the point that it is in any way dangerous to the earth or its inhabitants. Every year more scientific evidence comes forward that AGW does not exist, and its supporters (such as the IPCC) are having a difficult time backing up their claims with real data. Anyone who takes the closed minded view that AGW irrefutably exists (despite all the growing evidence to the contrary) and simply calls skeptics names -- is no different than a zealot who believed the earth was flat in year 1400.
In 30 years time "AGW" will be revealed to be a complete fraud. The advocates already recognize this as they attempt to blame hot weather, cold weather, and storms all on "climate change". In 30 years the earth will most likely be entering a naturally occurring colder period which will not be associated to man-made CO2 - no matter how much the "climate machine" attempts to create a fabricated linkage.
Yes, another post that exhibits the fine behavior that you exhibited for the past several years on ET.
Sometimes one has to call a spade a spade. You are an idiot and jem is crazed liar. Tsinged toe is a douchbag, the rest of the righties here are just plain morons.
But you on the other hand are a stellar example of brilliance! Oh yeah, that's the ticket!
It's a pretty low bar on ET. And I'm only an average progressive here. There are other lefties here that are much smarter than I am.
