Sarah Huckabee Sanders Tweet Violated Ethics Laws

00101ca7-500.jpg


The former director of the Office of Government Ethics said on Saturday that White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders’s decision to tweet about being kicked out of a Virginia restaurant violated ethics laws.
Sanders was asked to leave the Red Hen restaurant in Lexington, Va., on Friday night, but confirmed the incident in a Saturday morning tweet.


“Last night I was told by the owner of Red Hen in Lexington, VA to leave because I work for [President Trump] and I politely left,” Sanders tweeted. “Her actions say far more about her than about me. I always do my best to treat people, including those I disagree with, respectfully and will continue to do so.”

Last night I was told by the owner of Red Hen in Lexington, VA to leave because I work for @POTUS and I politely left. Her actions say far more about her than about me. I always do my best to treat people, including those I disagree with, respectfully and will continue to do so
— Sarah Sanders (@PressSec) June 23, 2018

Walter Shaub, the federal government's former top ethics watchdog, tweeted that Sanders's response, which was made from her official White House account, was a clear violation of federal law.

“Sarah, I know you don’t care even a tiny little bit about the ethics rules, but using your official account for this is a clear violation of 5 CFR 2635.702(a),” Shaub tweeted Saturday, referencing the law that states government employees cannot use public office for private gain.
“It’s the same as if an ATF agent pulled out his badge when a restaurant tried to throw him/her out,” he added.

Sarah, I know you don’t care even a tiny little bit about the ethics rules, but using your official account for this is a clear violation of 5 CFR 2635.702(a). It’s the same as if an ATF agent pulled out his badge when a restaurant tried to throw him/her out. https://t.co/Fj6OfBAdew
— Walter Shaub (@waltshaub) June 23, 2018

The tweet also violated the endorsements ban, Shaub argued, since Sanders’s tweet was “an obvious corollary for discouraging patronage."


Sanders used her official govt account to condemn a private business for personal reasons. Seeks to coerce business by using her office to get public to pressure it. Violates endorsements ban too, which has an obvious corollary for discouraging patronage. Misuse reg covers both.
— Walter Shaub (@waltshaub) June 23, 2018

“She can lob attacks on her own time but not using her official position,” he added in another tweet.

Opening sentences of 5 CFR 2635.702 cover both; 702(a) gives example of coercion; 702(c) gives example of endorsement. Also 2635.101(b)(8) bars preferential treatment, with obvious corollary for singling out. She can lob attacks on her own time but not using her official position
— Walter Shaub (@waltshaub) June 23, 2018
Stephanie Wilkinson, the co-owner of the restaurant, said she asked Sanders and her family to leave because of previous comments she had made defending the Trump administration’s ban on transgender military members.

The restaurant employs several LGBT employees, some of whom voiced concerns over having to serve Sanders, Wilkinson told The Washington Post.

“I’m not a huge fan of confrontation,” Wilkinson added. “I have a business, and I want the business to thrive. This feels like the moment in our democracy when people have to make uncomfortable actions and decisions to uphold their morals.”

Wilkinson blasted the Trump administration as “inhuman and unethical.”

Shaub, who had previously clashed with Trump over the president's business interests, resigned last year, leaving office nearly six months before the end of his term.
He frequently criticizes the Trump administration and called on another Trump spokeswoman, White House counselor Kellyanne Conway, to be fired for violating the Hatch Act.
 
Bunch of dipshits at that restaurant. Too busy thinking about their sex problems to treat a person with a different view as a human being.

Not sure what her personal gain was, and she was harassed for her functioning as a public official which makes it a public issue and she is entitled to speak back and take highly aggressive action such as being polite. Yeh, I am going to worry about that?

She should have just said "That's fine, I will just go to the Chick Fillet down the street."
 
Over/Under until that restaurant is closed is 8 months (I’ll take a dime on the under).
I don’t understand why businesses feel the need to piss off half their customers.
LacesOut
Yup. They have every right to not serve her.
And a special kind of retarded business owner this guy must be.
He’s just alienated 50% of his potential customers.

My guess - he will be out of business in 18 months.

Bravo - in America you have the right to be a fucking idiot.

LacesOut and Clubber Lang, Butt Buddies or same winey biatch?
 
Last edited:
I'm gonna go with the ethics expert on this one.

Yeah --- go with the clown who "He frequently criticizes the Trump administration and called on another Trump spokeswoman, White House counselor Kellyanne Conway, to be fired for violating the Hatch Act."

This character is just another clown with TDS. This example of accusing Sanders with ethics violations for a tweet is an example of a new low for his derangement.
 
Back
Top