Sanders Supporter Cries About Trump Voter Disagreeing With Her

What I meant to say was that you should consider that a world where Soros gets a big say because of his money would also mean a world where the Kochs get a big say as well. I don't care either way as long as it's fair and balanced.
Yeah, I'm sure that's *exactly* what you meant.

As an aside, and just as an observation, Soros's "big say" is more about giving back, whereas the Kochs's "big say" spending is all about getting more for themselves. Same difference, right?
 
Yeah, I'm sure that's *exactly* what you meant.

Great. It's nice we can agree for once.

As an aside, and just as an observation, Soros's "big say" is more about giving back, whereas the Kochs's "big say" spending is all about getting more for themselves. Same difference, right?

That would, of course, be your interpretation. Many of us Americans don't see it that way, though.
 
It's not about how much you contribute to the system, but whether you do or don't. That means someone paying $10 in taxes a year gets the same say as someone paying $100000.
On the surface, I kind of like the notion of "one vote for every $ one pays in federal income tax". That way, those who contributed the most to paying the freight would have the most say.

I'd like to hear the arguments of why that's a bad idea (if it is, of course).
Scat and I see fine with our view points, and each others.
 

Other than quoting various archived posts in your filing cabinet, I am not sure what you are asking with your quote-a-thon.

Scat and I both agree that someone should get a vote when they contribute to the system. The fact that he has a slightly different viewpoint in the method that should be applied doesn't bother me, nor does my opinion and slight variation bother him.

You seem to be the only one bothered.
 
Scat and I both agree that someone should get a vote when they contribute to the system. The fact that he has a slightly different viewpoint in the method that should be applied doesn't bother me, nor does my opinion and slight variation bother him.
A "slightly" different viewpoint? You threshold is any contribution for equal say, meanwhile Scat is talking about one vote for each dollar of federal income tax paid. Slightly different viewpoint? Really?

You're the only one that seems to be trying to weasel is his way around this conversation (yet again).
 
Back
Top