The Koch brothers only care about the Koch brothers. And now you care about the Koch brothers. That makes you rather useful -- to the Koch brothers.
Sanders Supporter Cries About Trump Voter Disagreeing With Her
- Thread starter JamesL
- Start date
Thank you for (again) putting words in my mouth. All I said was that if, in your world, Soros gets a big say because of his wealth, you should consider the Koch brothers would too.
Thank you for deleting the stupid comment re: $10 threshold before I had to waste time answering it.
That puts you at odds with your buddy, Scat:
Perhaps you could explain it to him.
I don't care whether I'm at odds with scat or you or Mickey Mouse. I don't depend on crowd think to feel better about my opinions. You should try it some time.
You were both on side regarding "skin in the game," but you diverged rather sharply on definition. I asked you to explain your view to him. You should read a post and try to understand its principal message before responding to it. Try it some time.
Why do I have to explain my view to him? He read it. If he has further questions, he'll ask. Who made you in charge of who I have to explain my views to?
You're the only one that seems to be trying to weasel is his way around this conversation (yet again). Scat and I see fine with our view points, and each others.
No, now you're putting different words into your own mouth. You didn't just point out that the Kochs would also have an increased say, you implied that it would be a good thing:
You can take that implication however you see fit (and you usually do). But since I was the author of the comment, I know what I meant to say. What I meant to say was that you should consider that a world where Soros gets a big say because of his money would also mean a world where the Kochs get a big say as well. I don't care either way as long as it's fair and balanced.
The rest is your assumptions and yambaggery.