San Francisco Has Fallen

They will point fingers at each other, but both the left and right are a complete disaster. The right doesn't want to fund anything that's necessary (mental institutions, housing, etc) and the left is afraid of being too authoritarian/cruel. For the vast majority of citizens to live their best lives, for the sake of saving lives, and for the sake of the overall economy we need to look at both more public housing and having stricter laws/enforcement like Asia has when it comes to drug use, drug dealing, and panhandling. This so-called harm reduction approach is killing people and destroying local economies. Oregon's decriminalization of drugs is a complete disaster. They saw Portugal decriminalized, but didn't actually follow their model whatsoever.


Whats the difference between the Portugal and Oregon's model?
 
I don't see anyone denying the homeless problem or the crime poverty brings with it. Hell, I've often decried the intranational asylum crisis created by red states criminalizing homelessness and Cali. having to subsidize their outflow.
This is where we differ. I think we both agree we need more housing for people. That said, once we get the housing I think there needs to be way less toleration. I would ban things like setting up tents/sleeping on sidewalks/in city parks, open-air drug use, and panhandling. The purpose of arresting them wouldn't be to send them to prison, but to get them help. These homeless people all need mental health evaluations. A good amount belong in mental health institutions, others might be able to perform basic jobs, and others just need to get off drugs/get their shit together, because their brain isn't totally gone.
 
Whats the difference between the Portugal and Oregon's model?
In Portugal they get people to go to treatment. In Oregon, almost nobody goes to treatment. It's just write them a citation and off to buy their next meth/fentanyl hit. Watch this from local Oregon news:
 
This is where we differ. I think we both agree we need more housing for people. That said, once we get the housing I think there needs to be way less toleration. I would ban things like setting up tents/sleeping on sidewalks/in city parks, open-air drug use, and panhandling. The purpose of arresting them wouldn't be to send them to prison, but to get them help. These homeless people all need mental health evaluations. A good amount belong in mental health institutions, others might be able to perform basic jobs, and others just need to get off drugs/get their shit together, because their brain isn't totally gone.
You'll love Adams in NY. He slashed mental health budget and is involuntarily committing ppl in hospitals to keep them off the streets so they (us) foot the bill.
 
You'll love Adams in NY. He slashed mental health budget and is involuntarily committing ppl in hospitals to keep them off the streets so they (us) foot the bill.
Honestly, mental health services should be provided by the state or even the federal government, not the city government.
 
This is where we differ. I think we both agree we need more housing for people. That said, once we get the housing I think there needs to be way less toleration. I would ban things like setting up tents/sleeping on sidewalks/in city parks, open-air drug use, and panhandling. The purpose of arresting them wouldn't be to send them to prison, but to get them help. These homeless people all need mental health evaluations. A good amount belong in mental health institutions, others might be able to perform basic jobs, and others just need to get off drugs/get their shit together, because their brain isn't totally gone.

If you make SF a safe heaven for LGBT while you persecute it everywhere else, you'll end up w/high per capita LGBT. If you make Cali. a sanctuary state while you persecute undocumented everywhere else, you'll end up w/high per capita undocumented. If you make Cali homeless friendly while you persecute everywhere else, you'll end up w/high per capita homeless.

Quite simply, if LGBT were accepted, immigrants welcomed, or the reality of homeless creation in an increasingly "trickle up redistribution of wealth" model was accepted, we wouldn't have this concentrations of the homeless across the nation.
 
Sorry but homelessness in America is a business for hundreds of for profit and non profit organizations and government employees dedicated to solving homelessness. It's like police; no crime needs no cops so crime is a business for cops and trying to defund the police will get you spikes in crime.
Homelessness is a misnomer used to avoid saying vagrants with substance abuse and mental problems; it's shorter and doesn't point to the reason these people are on the streets. Republicans got tired of funding mental and drug abuses facilities so threw everyone in the streets. It was cheaper for a while but 40 years later it's a lot more expensive. Truth is, all these people should be institutionalized and triaged with one group than just needs a little push to get back into society, another group that needs mental and substance abuse help for some time before they can go back to society and finally the last group that should live in assisted care for the rest of their lives.
 
..... Truth is, all these people should be institutionalized and triaged with one group than just needs a little push to get back into society, another group that needs mental and substance abuse help for some time before they can go back to society and finally the last group that should live in assisted care for the rest of their lives.

Free country for me but not for thee? Maybe we can ship them to a territory and call it a reservation, let them rule themselves and establish their own system of government.
 
Back
Top