Quote from annaland:
...I suppose this applies if you're at a university that concentrates on teaching and not research. However, research universities require their faculty to publish continuously. Better universities aim at higher tier journals for publications. Itâs quite time consuming (the research and referee process) and stressful so your 6-9hr <i>classroom</i> teaching becomes only a sixth or seventh+ of your entire work week. Summers are also filled with research and not just vacations. This is at least how it works for business school PhDs; it may be different for the liberal arts.
During my undergraduate days, I had some awful professors - not that they werenât smart or even brilliant - they just could not communicate very well. It wasnât until grad school that I learned that those professors, who could not seem to convey or internalize ideas, were the ones who were renowned because they were frequently published in the top tier finance journals. They were not there to teach and elaborate but to strictly do original research and get published; teaching was just a side note.
For those here undermining professors, please consider the following. Since most of the people here âknowâ finance; check out the SEC webpage and their regulations. Most, if not all of the regulations were established through research. Who did the research, you ask? Professors. The SEC hires professors, who in exchange for their research are paid and have access to the SEC data, which is hard to acquire. Often times their research is the reason for regulation changes. One would be surprised how through research the hands on jobs, that people here seem so excited about, are created and thus are merely the result of professors and research.
Stocks have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau.
Irving Fisher, Professor of Economics, Yale University, October 16, 1929.
but of course.