SAC"s DEMARK finally speaks!

I think his indicators have value all right, but why is he selling so hard and dissing everything else. Is he having trouble selling his services these days?
 
Poor surf. DeMark was annoying enough when he named every little two-bit kludge indicator he ever experimented with after himself. Now he declares himself a psychic ("I can pick tops and bottoms") and you fall for it like a ton of bricks.

Dude, get a clue. You've got about as much chance of discrediting trend following as you do of finding anything resembling science in "The New Science of Technical Analysis" by T. DeMark.
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

ask the trend following funds investors who started with them within the last 3-4 years if they are happy with the results--that's where the real answer lays.....


OK..then I will ask the investors who were with JWH in the 80's and 90's when they had insane returns how they felt. You can dissect and take look at a 3 year bad period of a lot of funds and imply they suck. It's all relative surf. Sure trend followers had a rough stretch. Part of trading. EVERY trader goes through it. Now they are at the top of the list.

It's funny how you rip on guys like Dunn and Henry, but praise the likes of a simpleton-like one trick pony like Neiderhoffer who has one method of trading which always results in a disaster. Over the years I have worked with and have had contact with fund managers and traders who dealt with VN professionally. They all said the same thing about him. He is a legend in his own mind who when you really get down to it, while a very smart person, is a horrible trader who used a very simple method used by many, but unlike others who had risk mgmt skills, didnt and lost everything in his fund.
 
Quote from tokyotrading:

Marketsurfer,

The guys such as SAC and the like are not even in the same ball park such as Bill Dunn, J.W. Henry, Ed Seykota, Jerry Parker, Richard Dennis, Donchian. How long is SAC in business and then compare that with the track records of ANY of the above mentioned guys. No question, SAC is one of the top hedge fund outlets but letting a guy who has never made a fortune in trading (yes your dude, Tom DeMark) rip apart trend following is simply ludicrous.

And by the way, where do you see 80% drawdowns. None of the above mentioned guys ever, to my knowledge, experienced 80% drawdowns. Sure, methods can be wrongly applied, especially when being leveraged to the hilt. However, having to listen to a guy who needs to sell his indicators on Bloomberg and other outlets how trendfollowing is dead is very funny. Well, I shall say that I am VERY HAPPY that such people exist because they assist in feeding those who consistantly outperform markets by simply following price trends.

So, not trying to criticise others with different approaches if it works for them, fine, but I just dont really get what evidence you use to support the argument that trend following is garbage. I think some of the most successful traders of our times were trend followers, happy to challenge me by showing who has outperformed above guys with other methods.

So, waiting for your names of guys whose performance outshines the one of the guys in my post. By the way, let me challenge you, so we can keep the record straight: You mentioned some investors of funds, which apply trend following methods, who are unhappy with the recent performance. Care to share your sources and which funds you are talking about? Cause I also have a friend of a friend of my grandmas friend who made a bunch...if you know what I mean.

I am not familiar with Demark and didnt know he wasnt a trader , but someone who just sold his indicators to Bloomberg. It's kind of funny hearing a guy who doesnt have the stones to trade rip on legends like Dunn and JWH.

Take whatever Surf says with a grain of salt. Like Demark he isnt a trader, but plays one on here. I think he is mad because he has been bearish gold during an EASY up trend, and while others are cleaning up, his little counter trend proclamation is blowing up in his face.
 
Surf,

since you don't trade why do you post so much on a trading message board? You seem quite attached to your views on what trading methods are valid; what makes you think you're in any kind of position to pass judgment on any trader?
 
Quote from kut2k2:

Poor surf. DeMark was annoying enough when he named every little two-bit kludge indicator he ever experimented with after himself...
I agree completely. Very annoying. DeMark this, DeMark that, DeMarker, etc. I actually bought his "new science" book in the mid '90s when it came out. After reading a bit of it, I just wanted to tell him to kiss my DeMark.
 
Which one is the countdown? The big gear or the little gear?

3343vok.jpg
 
This thread is nonsense. I suspect that all successful traders are trend traders of sorts, in that they either catch a trend very early on or further along the way. Such trends need not be of a specific time frame that applies to all traders (as marketsurfer seems to believe), and one trader's trend may well be another trader's countertrend. The matter of drawdowns as a defining characteristic has more to do with timing proficiency and (loose or tight) money management. People who habitually ignore trends of any time frame from time to time are people such as, say, marketsurfer's Mr. Niederhoffer...
 
Quote from NY0BScalper:

Surf,

since you don't trade why do you post so much on a trading message board? You seem quite attached to your views on what trading methods are valid; what makes you think you're in any kind of position to pass judgment on any trader?


It's always easy to yell and critique from the cheap seats. It's much different when you are on the field and have to actually play the game.

Surf has had season tickets in the nose bleed seats since I have been on here.
 
I have never thought highly of this DeMark fellow after reading one of his books. Well, it's good to know I was not so wrong in my opinion.

There is more than one way to skin the cat. One would think he would know about it.
 
Back
Top