S&P has had it ! Intermediate term top right here !

[makloda]

Quote from ghostzapper:
this thread began w S&P @ 1536

Now we're @ 1540.40.

 

[Landis82]

Quote from ghostzapper:

W all the hours you spend searching through my threads and posts,
I hope you're doing something constructive w all this info, like preparing a biography on me !

It's pretty easy to come across all of your "The S&P Has Topped" threads because ET has been "littered" with them for nearly 4 years . . . The "newbies" here at ET may not be aware of that, but they will be now.

Face it.
You have ZERO credibility.
Perhaps it's time for yet another alias?

 

[ghostzapper]

Quote from Landis82:

It's pretty easy to come across all of your "The S&P Has Topped" threads because ET has been "littered" with them for nearly 4 years . . .

Jealousy is a bitch, ain't it waggie.
All those years, and you've accomplished nothing w respect to trading.
While i've already been featured in top business periodicals. that must hurt you bad waggie !

Looks like you may have a credibility problem, it's easy to find page 63 on a specific thread of mine ?

Quote from Landis82:

There are several consecutive pages of the thread in which you are basically talking to yourself, and no one gives a damn. In fact, Page #63 is a great example of this.
Six straight posts by YOU and no one else.

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=94442&perpage=6&pagenumber=62

LMAO

 

[EqtTrdr]

Quote from makloda:

Now we're @ 1540.40.

rofl

 

[ghostzapper]

Quote from EqtTrdr:

rofl

you're now going to call this post sarcasm right ?

 

[SiSePuede!]

Quote from makloda:

Now we're @ 1540.40.

Looks like 1533 to me.

 

[ghostzapper]

Guaranteed this intermediate term top is going to hold.
Just look at the poll results !

 

[Landis82]

Quote from ghostzapper:

Guaranteed this intermediate term top is going to hold.
Just look at the poll results !

Leave it to someone as ignorant as you to think that a sample size of 34 votes is statistically significant. LOL!

Pathetic.
Absolutely pathetic.

 

[ghostzapper]

Quote from Landis82:

Leave it to someone as ignorant as you to think that a sample size of 34 votes is statistically significant.

Are there any 9th graders out there who took high school statistics that can explain to waggie that a sample size of even 20-25 is statistically significant, and would simply have a larger degree of error .

I know you were unable to attend high school waggie, and I know you were picked on when you were on the NYFE, and as such, you were alienated to the point where you find yourself today stalking anonymous posters w insane rants. Actually much like you were doing 3 years ago. I guess it's true: its hard to change old habits.

 

[Pa(b)st Prime]

C'mon Wags. You know that I like Romeo and he's made some excellent calls. Both of you are great guys. Can you stop flaming each other?

Quote from Landis82:

You've done absolutely nothing with your pathetic little life.
The fact that you continue to log-onto ET with alias after alias, year after year is pretty clear for all to see. And whenever your insecure little Ego gets backed into a corner, you always pull out the "I'll bet you $50,000 that I have audited track records of my blah, blah, blah, performance . . ."

I know that.
Pabst knows that.
And Riskarb who tried to kick sand in your face to the tune of $50,000 knows that.

Dude, is that the best you can do anymore?
After all of these years on ET?

So many aliases, so little time.
You are the biggest JOKE on ET.
Congratulations.