When I say High ATM IV, then it not necessarily means to sell the ATM strike.
It rather means for filtering/finding tickers with high IVs: if it has a high ATM IV, then its other strikes surely will have even higher IVs....
I already had told you about this site in the pvt thread: https://marketchameleon.com/volReports/VolatilityRankings
Click 2x on the column heading "Current IV30" to sort the list for the highest ATM IVs.
Of course throw away the penny stocks.
Try your strategy for example with the ticker SAVE and its options.
Forget your IWM and RWMThey are useless toy tickers, like all ETFs, IMO
![]()
I will have to double check these results, but this is what I got when selling 1 OTM starting on DEC30 2022.
IWM 1 contract (Weekly)
Funds allocated $17,436.00
Total Premium $5,755.00
Total Realized losses -$6,600.00
Total -$1,223.48
Total Spread loss/fees -$437.25
Net Income -$1,660.73
Monthly income -$136.50
Save 1 contract (Weekly)
Funds allocated $1,969.00
Total Premium $6,005.00
Total Realized losses -$900.00
Total $5,117.45
Total Spread loss/fees -$437.25
Net Income $4,680.20
Monthly income $384.67
Save 10 contracts (Weekly)
Funds allocated $19,690.00
Total Premium $60,050.00
Total Realized losses -$9,000.00
Total $51,174.50
Total Spread loss/fees -$1,033.50
Net Income $50,141.00
Monthly income $4,121.18
The difference appears to be in assignments not in the premium. There were only a 2 assignments over the entire year if I opened selling a 19 put on Dec30 2022. The worst one was being assigned in Aug for 17 and getting called out in November for 10 for $-700. Why so few assignments is the question? Is that an anomaly? The atr is .71-1.12 versus IWM which is 3-4, so maybe that's what I should be looking at. But if atr is lower then so should the premium, but I guess that's the answer...these premiums for SAVE are jacked up currently with high IV...which would imply a higher atr, but then why so few assignments?
Last edited:
They are useless toy tickers, like all ETFs, IMO