Ruth Bader Ginzburg: If Trump wins move to New Zealand

Point taken. But I think you will agree that the Republicans have a way of squeezing the last bit of juice out of every opportunity while being fairly dismissive of ~similar conduct when it pertains to their own. Arguably more so than Democrats. Not that Dems don't go after their opposition, but I think they are somewhat more even handed. Relatively peaking.

Tell that to Tom DeLay or Bob McDonnell.
 
your comment is delusional and may be caused by you being in Canada.

Dems have history of letting crooks run from Hillary Clinton to Barney Frank to a mayor like Marion Barry.

The press will find Republicans like McCain who will eat their own for some press and a whiff of a scandal.

Point taken. But I think you will agree that the Republicans have a way of squeezing the last bit of juice out of every opportunity while being fairly dismissive of ~similar conduct when it pertains to their own. Arguably more so than Democrats. Not that Dems don't go after their opposition, but I think they are somewhat more even handed. Relatively peaking.
 
Last edited:
this goes in the duh... column. It shows every lefty who has been running interference for her is either ignorant of the law and not that sharp or an unthinking partisan plant.

This is a rare supreme ct justice apology and I am sure it comes after fellow justices explained to her everything I said. She disrespected her colleagues, the court and the country.


“On reflection, my recent remarks in response to press inquiries were ill-advised and I regret making them,” Ginsburg stated on Thursday. “Judges should avoid commenting on a candidate for public office. In the future I will be more circumspect.”
 
this goes in the duh... column and proves every lefty who has been running interference for her is either ignorant of the law and not that sharp or an unthinking partisan plant.


“On reflection, my recent remarks in response to press inquiries were ill-advised and I regret making them,” Ginsburg stated on Thursday. “Judges should avoid commenting on a candidate for public office. In the future I will be more circumspect.”
Wow, if only Drumpf could show such maturity!
 
this goes in the duh... column and proves every lefty who has been running interference for her is either ignorant of the law and not that sharp or an unthinking partisan plant.


“On reflection, my recent remarks in response to press inquiries were ill-advised and I regret making them,” Ginsburg stated on Thursday. “Judges should avoid commenting on a candidate for public office. In the future I will be more circumspect.”
Another after the fact admission similar to Lynch and dare I say Hillary. This, I should have known better, has become the new age defense of the elites. Let the unwashed masses try that and see how it works out.
 
As I told your interference running handle earlier... Trump is not a Supreme Ct. judge. A different set of ethics applies.

while I agree his tone could be a heck of lot better. So could Obamas.

Wow, if only Drumpf could show such maturity!
 
Trump is not a Supreme Ct. judge. A different set of ethics applies.
As I told you before, Drumpf is running for PRESIDENT.

Oh yeah, the things Obama says every day are so inflammatory. *rolleyes*
 
Back
Top