Ruth Bader Ginzburg: If Trump wins move to New Zealand

[Ricter]

always running a distraction of some sort for the left. ... aren't you.

You're always utterly missing the point. Drumpf is so inflammatory his campaign is not even letting him speak right now, teleprompter or no.

Now if scotus gets a case involving Drumpf, then you might have an argument. Until then, I think her joking about moving to NZ can be forgotten.

 

[Ricter]

Instead, the SCOTUS has morphed into an ideologically Leftist shitbag cabal, sadly.

Or you're so far right they just seem that way.

 

[der_kommissar]

Only "inflammatory" to shitbag's like Riddler and his ilk...Ya know the politically correct ignore the facts types...

 

[der_kommissar]

Drumpf is so inflammatory his campaign is not even letting him speak right now, teleprompter or no.

"Or you're so far left they just seem that way"...

 

[fhl]

Jeff Greenfield ‏@greenfield64 8h8 hours agoManhattan, NY
2/2 If there's a redo of Bush v. Gore, how does Ginsburg not recuse herself, given her Trump comments?

 

[jem]

you comment is totally irrelevant and incorrect to boot.

Greenfeld just pointed out the tip of the iceberg of her utter disrespect of her job, her colleagues and the institution. What she did was way over the line for a Sup Ct justice.
Her action also disrepects the arguments she made as a justice. It brings into question her entire career's work as partisan garbage. Her apologists will have to say she and not thinking when she uttered this detritus.

You're always utterly missing the point. Drumpf is so inflammatory his campaign is not even letting him speak right now, teleprompter or no.

Now if scotus gets a case involving Drumpf, then you might have an argument. Until then, I think her joking about moving to NZ can be forgotten.

 

[Ricter]

you comment is totally irrelevant and incorrect to boot.

Greenfeld just pointed out the tip of the iceberg of her utter disrespect of her job, her colleagues and the institution. What she did was way over the line for a Sup Ct justice.
Her action also disrepects the arguments she made as a justice. It brings into question her entire career's work as partisan garbage. Her apologists will have to say she and not thinking when she uttered this detritus.

I guess that's why we have more than one SC justice, to compensate for the inclusion of some who might "not come from the most advanced schools”, the ones that benefited from a “slower track," right?

 

[jem]

wow... you are doing everything you can to change the subject. could you have written something more off point?

What she wrote has nothing to do with schooling or judicial pedigree. What she did was act like a partisan hack.

What if Roberts said if Hillary is elected we won't be able to trust anything anyone from here administrations says under oath? Would it matter where he went to school?

I guess that's why we have more than one SC justice, to compensate for the inclusion of some who might "not come from the most advanced schools”, the ones that benefited from a “slower track," right?

 

[CaptainObvious]

Great, that's just the kind of attitude you want from someone holding one of the most powerful positions in the country. Why even have elections? Let's just let those really smart people like Ruthie decide for us. This cunt should be thrown out on her ass immediately. Oh, we can't do that. How convenient. I thought these assholes were supposed to be above the political fray. This country is in big f'n trouble.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Great, that's just the kind of attitude you want from someone holding one of the most powerful positions in the country. Why even have elections? Let's just let those really smart people like Ruthie decide for us. This cunt should be thrown out on her ass immediately. Oh, we can't do that. How convenient. I thought these assholes were supposed to be above the political fray. This country is in big f'n trouble.

She may be left leaning, but she never said anything about any of the other candidates in any of the elections during her lengthy tenure on the Supreme Court. So this comment is not a matter of course for her; it is not in her nature to speak out in the manner that she did. But when a smart, dedicated and otherwise demure person sees a fool with the potential for evil seeking the highest office in the land, it's hard not to admire her for pointing it out.