Russian Hacking Questions

When
Except when it's the FBI with evidence on Hillary, right?

I'll believe proof, not someone saying something - no matter who it is. When that is available (assuming it ever is) please post it. I'd love to look through it.

When dealing with the actions of Intelligence organizations, there is never going to be rock solid proof, and always a shield of plausible deniability. But you knew that.

It's just more a matter of deciding which side you are on. We know you aren't on America's.
 
WASHINGTON — When Special Agent Adrian Hawkins of the Federal Bureau of Investigation called the Democratic National Committee in September 2015 to pass along some troubling news about its computer network, he was transferred, naturally, to the help desk.

His message was brief, if alarming. At least one computer system belonging to the D.N.C. had been compromised by hackers federal investigators had named “the Dukes,” a cyberespionage team linked to the Russian government.

The F.B.I. knew it well: The bureau had spent the last few years trying to kick the Dukes out of the unclassified email systems of the White House, the State Department and even the Joint Chiefs of Staff, one of the government’s best-protected networks.


As the year draws to a close, it now seems possible that there will be multiple investigations of the Russian hacking — the intelligence review Mr. Obama has ordered completed by Jan. 20, the day he leaves office, and one or more congressional inquiries. They will wrestle with, among other things, Mr. Putin’s motive.

Did he seek to mar the brand of American democracy, to forestall anti-Russian activism for both Russians and their neighbors? Or to weaken the next American president, since presumably Mr. Putin had no reason to doubt American forecasts that Mrs. Clinton would win easily? Or was it, as the C.I.A. concluded last month, a deliberate attempt to elect Mr. Trump?

In fact, the Russian hack-and-dox scheme accomplished all three goals.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us...T.nav=top-news


So it definitely happened, and the dumb Trumpers, and Trump of course, won't admit it. Sort of like man made climate change and other facts.
Since when did an opinion from the NY Times become proof.

Please provide evidence. At least provide some IP addresses of who received the information.

There hasn't been any evidence whatsoever presented to the public.
 
15442311_613777122162166_3072974934729204141_n.jpg
 
Trump national security pick Monica Crowley repeatedly pushed conspiracy theory about Clinton aide
By Andrew Kaczynski, CNN
Updated 12:18 PM ET, Fri December 16, 2016

(CNN) "Fox News analyst Monica Crowley, Donald Trump's pick to be senior director of strategic communications for the National Security Council, repeatedly pushed an unfounded conspiracy theory that claimed Hillary Clinton's aide Huma Abedin has ties to Islamic extremists.

"The claim, which circulated among far-right websites, has been labeled as false and unfounded by fact-checkers from the Washington Post, Politifact, and Snopes.

"Claims Abedin was tied to the Muslim Brotherhood are based on flimsy connections tying together people and events from decades ago. Crowley made the charge in radio appearances, columns, and on Fox News over the years, a CNN KFile review found.

"The claims have also been strongly rebutted by high profile Republicans. Former House Speaker John Boehner called the accusations "pretty dangerous" and then-House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers called Abedin an "American patriot." The allegations received a passionate rebuke from Republican Sen. John McCain on the Senate floor.

"Still, Crowley pushed it repeatedly. An email seeking comment sent to a Trump transition spokesperson, Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn, and Crowley was not immediately returned."

More >>
You libtards just copy and paste anything that goes with your ideology as fact.

Well, The Hill wrote an article that states otherwise. So which publication is correct?

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...0-huma-abedins-ties-to-the-muslim-brotherhood

Since you posted the article, I have to assume that you believe that the Muslim Brotherhood are extremists and it is clearly bad to be associated with them.

Does Obama then have ties to extremist?

http://www.politico.com/blogs/polit...ation-meets-with-white-house-officials-119647

Members of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood met with U.S. officials including White House staffers, the administration confirmed Tuesday.

"Following Egypt's revolution, we have broadened our engagement to include new and emerging political parties and actors," White House spokesman Tommy Vietor told POLITICO.
 
Last edited:
http://www.carlbernstein.com/magazine_cia_and_media.php

Some excerpts below from Carl Bernstein's 1977 Rolling Stone cover story.

Alsop is one of more than 400 American journalists who in the past twenty‑five years have secretly carried out assignments for the Central Intelligence Agency, according to documents on file at CIA headquarters.

Among the executives who lent their cooperation to the Agency were Williarn Paley of the Columbia Broadcasting System, Henry Luce of Tirne Inc., Arthur Hays Sulzberger of the New York Times, Barry Bingham Sr. of the LouisviIle Courier‑Journal, and James Copley of the Copley News Service. Other organizations which cooperated with the CIA include the American Broadcasting Company, the National Broadcasting Company, the Associated Press, United Press International, Reuters, Hearst Newspapers, Scripps‑Howard, Newsweek magazine, the Mutual Broadcasting System, the Miami Herald and the old Saturday Evening Post and New York Herald‑Tribune.

By far the most valuable of these associations, according to CIA officials, have been with the New York Times, CBS and Time Inc.

 
Back
Top