Russia & Ukraine

you dont think Putin is setting up to invade Ukraine on any made up reason?

I didn't watch the video in the post because it looked like the one I had already seen where there was an assertion that the government had evidence that the ruskie's were going to attempt false flag operations.

If so, sign me up. I want to see that evidence- especially if I were a reporter- and being asked to report that and carry water for the government. Refer to the Iraq/WMD fiasco for more on that.

If he has made a secure bipartisan presentation of the info to the select group of congressmen and senators that review intel, I could work with that and he could have said that if he did.
 
Last edited:
Overcast and rainy all week though.
Moon's not much good.
Muddy roads

upload_2022-2-14_15-20-20.png
 
I didn't watch the video in the post because it looked like the one I had already seen where there was an assertion that the government had evidence that the ruskie's were going to attempt false flag operations.

If so, sign me up. I want to see that evidence- especially if I were a reporter- and being asked to report that and carry water for the government. Refer to the Iraq/WMD fiasco for more on that.

If he has made a secure bipartisan presentation of the info to the select group of congressmen and senators that review intel, I could work with that and he could have said that if he did.


Why do we need to see any Congress intel.... Putin is openly moving troops and arms to the border...
 
Why do we need to see any Congress intel.... Putin is openly moving troops and arms to the border...
Don't trust the TikToks of hundreds of citizens Ocho.

Also, don't trust your lying eyes. Those satellite images is the new call of duty
 
Why do we need to see any Congress intel.... Putin is openly moving troops and arms to the border...

Well, you are arguing that there is sufficient evidence from other sources to reach a certain conclusion without relying upon a specific allegation that raised by a government weasel, and that is fine and not at issue.

But if the government person wants you to reach a certain conclusion based on what they are saying, they need to produce the evidence, either publicly or in a secure briefing and your representatives can state whether they were satisfied. You know, for example, if they say that two russians fired upon civilians or something with the clear purpose of ginning up support for ramping up action, well that could easily happen. But I would have to see the evidence as a reporter before passing it along unquestioned. This applies to the domestic front as well. The government pumped up reporters to carry water for them and recycle all sorts of stories about Trump's Russia connections and communications with them via a server at trump tower etc. It was all bullshiite.

That was just good reporting on the part of that reporter who asked to see the evidence. And the government dink was being clinically defensive by accusing him to be a russian supporter or something just for questioning him. Nope. They are most definitely not above being questioned just because they refuse to answer. Most likely his evidence is shaky.
 
so you siding with Putin?

Fucking idiotic.

You siding with a fake president who wants to kill our kids so he can enrich himself off Ukraine and China?

Hard to believe people are falling for all this fake bullshit.

Oh, and by the way, who exactly is the US ambassador to Ukraine?
 
Fucking idiotic.

You siding with a fake president who wants to kill our kids so he can enrich himself off Ukraine and China?

Hard to believe people are falling for all this fake bullshit.

Oh, and by the way, who exactly is the US ambassador to Ukraine?

705b6968-44db-40a5-a9d8-e65a6230bbde_text.gif


seek help bruh; you've lost the thread.
 
Back
Top