do you know, what "luck" means for a russian "soldier"?
when the first bullet kills him immediately.
do YOU think you will be lucky?
lol
Russia & Ukraine
- Thread starter UsualName
- Start date
do you know, what "luck" means for a russian "soldier"?
when the first bullet kills him immediately.
do YOU think you will be lucky?
lol
More Russian dead than Ukrainians.You know how embarrassing it is for Russia to be at a so called stalemate with a small country like Ukraine?
The US can take out most of Russias land based nukes before Russia could even fire them.The subs would be harder but we would get plenty of them too.
False equivalency. The US would NOT be able to overthrow Ukraine within 30ndays, are you kidding me? How do they even transport anything near the Ukrainian border? If you argue about air supremacy then Russia has not even shown any of its airforce muscle yet.
This entire thread is populated by woke kids. Russia has not put any serious effort into this crisis. If they wanted they could bomb the shit out of the entire Ukraine within hours.
Some stats:
830,000 active military personell
5900 nuclear warheads
4100 military aircraft
1500 helicopters
530 attack helicopters
Not even talking about land base military craft
This entire thread is populated by woke kids. Russia has not put any serious effort into this crisis. If they wanted they could bomb the shit out of the entire Ukraine within hours.
Some stats:
830,000 active military personell
5900 nuclear warheads
4100 military aircraft
1500 helicopters
530 attack helicopters
Not even talking about land base military craft
To be fair, Russia being the attacker should have more losses than the defender, Ukraine. And, Ukraine, on its own, would have been overwhelmed by Russia within weeks if not for western support.
With all of that said, the Ukrainians have fought with bravery and intelligence and should absolutely be commended for such.
Really? How so? The US got its ass kicked, let's see... In Vietnam, Cambodia, Afghanistan, Philippines, Canadian invasion, North Vietnam, Disbanding the Iraq army, multiple locations in Africa. Actually the question should be asked where the US military has actually been successful in the past 70 years.
How would the US possibly take out a single site without total and final retaliation? Have you been watching too much SciFi recently? Relatively speaking the US has lost an immense military power over the last several decades. There is zero chance the US would stand a chance anywhere in Asia today, nor anywhere near Russia. If you count liberating a little middle eastern autocratic country from invasion a success then that speaks to your low standards and benchmark.
How would the US possibly take out a single site without total and final retaliation? Have you been watching too much SciFi recently? Relatively speaking the US has lost an immense military power over the last several decades. There is zero chance the US would stand a chance anywhere in Asia today, nor anywhere near Russia. If you count liberating a little middle eastern autocratic country from invasion a success then that speaks to your low standards and benchmark.
Nope. Ukraine has proven its ability to defend against Russian air strikes via planes. And, the west so far has determined to arm Ukraine to the point of meeting the Russian attacks. If Russia escalates, they know the west will give Ukraine the weaponry to negate whatever escalation russia brings.
I agree with you that their resistance is laudable yet 270 aircraft don't decide the battle against 6000 aircraft available, including helicopters. No matter how new or old those aircraft are...
With a good military like The US thats usually not the case.When was the last time The US military loss more men than their opponent?