Rush returns Monday
- Thread starter AAAintheBeltway
- Start date
My post concerning your incomplete sentence was made at 7:13 AM.
ARogueTrader
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 383
11-18-03 07:13 AM
Quote from max401:
I guess need the footnotes for guidance.
The above sentence is incomplete. Is that intentional? More sarcasm perhaps?
You post of the incorrect sentence was initially made at 7:01 AM
max401
Elite Member
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 1947
11-18-03 07:01 AM
Quote from ARogueTrader:
Is it possible for you to be less sarcastic? I tried to address you directly, and all you seem capable of doing is responding with sarcasm.
Is that a pathological response on your part to reply to direct questions with sarcasm, or just a bad habit?
It was a direct answer and in itself also a rhetorical question. I guess you need the footnotes for guidance.
So, if I follow the time line, you posted at 7:01 AM the incomplete sentence, then you say that before I responded to the post 12 minutes later, you corrected it?
You just happen to be re-reading your post 12 minutes later, nearly instantaneously between the 30 seconds I read and responded to your reply, in between my hitting the reply button, before ever reading my reply, you found the error and corrected it? Is that what you are saying?
1. Click on "Error404"
2. Click on "Search all post for this user."
3. Scan page of last 25 posts.
Elapsed time: about 2 minutes
Gosh, I guess I'll have to start making delayed responses to hide my "obsession."
How long have you had this obsession with protecting RS7, vvv... er, I mean rogue trader?
Nope Max, you missed the point as usual.
As is your way, you are talking out of your ass. Now you are clamoring for legal papers that were SUBMITTED BUT NOT FILED as I clearly said. How can you seriously expect to get anything from me?
When I was younger and even more foolish, I complied with your compulsions. You said with absolute certainty that I could NEVER have been in Chamonix. I posted my ski pass with my picture on it. You used a paint program to deface it. You said I NEVER could have been in Monte Carlo. I posted photos of my son on he beach. You claimed it was "just a kid" I randomly took pictures of in Monte Carlo. Despite the fact I had pictures of the very same kid in two different cities in the south of France on consecutive days wearing two different outfits. Amazing coincidence.
You tried to lay one of your "clever traps" when you asked me where I got my French visa. I said "Chicago". You pounced. Said I was lying again. France NEVER issued visas to Americans. But lo and behold, I posted a scan of that visa. Then you backpedaled by saying you "lied for the greater good". Indeed France DID issue visas at the time.
In discussions that had nothing to do with you, I mentioned my first wife died of cancer. You pounced on me again. First that I was being "shameless" and "morbid". When in reality, I was just talking about facts. Then it became another of your challenges to my veracity. This episode (my wife passing) became another of your "alleged" incidents. I posted a copy of her death certificate. Then you claimed that I harped on it endlessly. A search (your specialty) showed I made reference to her 11 times in over 2000 posts. A similar search showed you made references to me in about a thousand posts. But because you play by your own rules, THAT was acceptable. I loved my wife and I still miss her to this day. Are you in love with me? Are you the military guy in the movie "American Beauty"? (yes, that is the image I have of you).
When will you realize that all your ridicule and name calling adds up to nothing except the obvious. You have no life of your own, and you get your jollies by calling me a liar.
You literally SCREAMED that you wanted pictures of me playing guitar (it was bass guitar) with the Allman Bros. Sure Max, everyone carried cameras with them when they went to the Fillmore. Hahahahaha! The only "proof" to be had here is that you were never there. Shut ins don't venture out. Agoraphobics don't go to the Fillmore. (unless there are web sites that show recorded concerts from the late 60's and early 70s. In that case I would believe you would find a front row seat.
I said Greg Allman told me I introduced him to cheer. I never said I recalled doing it. I believe I said I tended to NOT believe him.
I said I had a girlfriend who became a famous movie star. How would you like me to prove that? Since you have taken your pathological investigation of me off the ET boards, and now know more about me than anyone would want you to know about them, why don't you just call my wife at work? I know you know her name and where she works. You also know she is an officer of the court. So why don' t you call her and
A) Ask her if she submitted the court papers, and
B) Ask her if she knows or has ever met my former girlfriend who became a movie star?
I said I was on an "illegal" patrol mission in Asia. YOU called it a "secret spy mission". Not me. So I guess your "poetic license has no limits. Say anything. And then say I said it. And then call me a liar for allegedly saying what YOU said. What I actually said never seems to matter if it doesn't fit your purposes. Your game is quite clear to anyone who can think and read. Fortunately, no one seems to care what you say. Except me. No one likes to be called a liar. But even I have become calloused to it coming from you. The source is weak and pathetic. So say whatever you want. My experiences were real. "Real Reality" as opposed to your "Virtual Reality". So Max, stay in your cyber world and live in your glass house there and throw plenty of stones. It's really very productive for you...LOL.
I said I was a market maker at the CBOE. You called me a liar about that too. Then I gave you the names of people at the exchange to call and verify my position.
You didn't call them. You can call my wife, but I am sure you won't call her either. Why face facts when you can scream "liar" to your hearts content? Facts would only ruin your fun.
Sorry I did not place you back on ignore. My bad. Rant again Max. I won't see it (thankfully). And on the behalf of virtually EVERYONE on ET, I beg you to just fade away. There is enough negativity here without you. And negativity is all you have to contribute. I am sure you will admit that much....since it is what you are obviously proud of. I asked you numerous times to cite an example of a post you made regarding trading. Your answer was to not answer.
What is your value here? ET does not need a "grand inquisitor". ET does not need anyone who takes their obsessions with other members off the boards. You have investigated me and others by going beyond what is said here. Clearly you are obsessive. Certainly it was frightening to my wife that you investigated us. It would be, if not frightening, then surely very "uncomfortable" at the least to have someone demonstrate their obsession as you have with me. You call me a liar based on your twisted assumptions. I call you a stalker based on facts!
You like to butt heads with me. I offered you a chance to debate me on any issue. I said you could pick the topic and which side to take. A REAL debate, giving you every advantage. But of course you ignored the offer. Why get involved in a fair discussion of differences when you can just hide behind your very precious anonymity and make DEMANDS of others to give up theirs?
You have the perfect "MAX set-up". You make statements about others that are either indefensible, or would require giving out personal information. Yet you Max, would never even tell us what time zone you live in.
Have a nice life. Try and live it without me being such an integral part of it. Really Max, I have no impact on your life. Or shouldn't. I understand that there are mental infirmaries that may make things different for you, but IN GENERAL, my life should have no bearing on yours. Time for you to move on. Really!!!
RS
Your response is about what I expected from someone who said this:
"Jeez, why not just post the link?"
Apparently you don't like being called to task for inaccuracies, misspelling, incomplete sentences, time frames, issues with others posting of a transcript, etc.
Oh, and I don't believe the "2 minutes" to search 25 posts of RS/Error to find all your responses and then count your responses to see if they are acrimonious either.
Get a clue. You don't submit, you file. If it's rejected, it is still on the record as having been filed. In any event, they give you copies that are officially stamped with the time and date. Do you think that you hand legal papers to the Clerk of a court and walk out with nothing?
Since you are making the distinct claim that you went to the Court and submitted papers and received absolutely nothing in return, there can be only one answer, your story about:
"my wife has already filed a police report and also filed papers for a restraining order with the PB County Court."
This is just another hilarious TALL TALE by RS7/Error404/Outlaw et al. What a liar. The Filmore, Greg Allman, Cher, movie star, Choppers Over Monaco, secret spy mission* during Viet Nam, etc. Please, you have no credibility.
(*Jeez, excuse me it was: " 'illegal' patrol mission in Asia." Yeah, right and I'm General Douglas MacArthur.)
"Even you could figure this out."
More sarcasm? Or is it passive aggressive behavior? Or just plain mean spiritedness? Or condescension?
No, two minutes is not sufficient to begin the search RS7/Error's posts, then look for a response from you, then read the post to find acrimony, then go back to the search and repeat that process 25 times.
In two minutes there are 120 seconds. Divide that by 25 times, and you get 4.8 seconds. 4.8 seconds to find Error's post, then scroll to find your response, assuming there was one at all, then read it to find acrimony, then go back to the find the next post to examine?
No, 2 minutes is not sufficient to perform the task you said you performed.
I would call you a liar, but that serves no purpose. You know the truth, and most reasonable people can see that you are not at all interested in accuracy when it comes to your statements.