Rush Limbaugh announces he has 'advanced lung cancer'
- Thread starter Optionpro007
- Start date
tony is not in the business of analysis.
just look at his most recent post.
he makes meaningless (for this conversations) distinctions because he has departed from the talking posts.
If I were the dnc I would reduce his per post payment down from 35 cents a post.
The good news is for those who put him on ignore soon... he may not be able to change his nick name for a while. He probably needs to get approval which he will not want to seek too soon because it would be strong indication of how useless his content is.
I am pretty sure I will put him on ignore when and if I start a polling thread.
just look at his most recent post.
he makes meaningless (for this conversations) distinctions because he has departed from the talking posts.
If I were the dnc I would reduce his per post payment down from 35 cents a post.
The good news is for those who put him on ignore soon... he may not be able to change his nick name for a while. He probably needs to get approval which he will not want to seek too soon because it would be strong indication of how useless his content is.
I am pretty sure I will put him on ignore when and if I start a polling thread.
8 million in 2018 does not mean squat in 2020 (most likely)
Different race, different candidates.
The correct questions and the template for analysis is Presidential years.
Do these democrats turn out Obama numbers?
Will Trump turn out the same numbers he did in 2016 or more or less?
Its early... but we we get an indication that there is trouble for democrats at the moment.
2018 is most likely completely irrelevant.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/04/iowa-caucus-low-turnout-110674
....
And it wasn’t just the turnout totals that were worrisome for Democrats. It was the makeup of the electorate.
Entrance polls showed first-time caucus-goers down this year, to about one-third of all caucus-goers. That fell lower not only than 2008, when nearly 60 percent of caucus-goers were first-time participants, but also 2016.
It was a deflating acknowledgment for a party that is desperate to register and turn out first-time voters in the fall.
Different race, different candidates.
The correct questions and the template for analysis is Presidential years.
Do these democrats turn out Obama numbers?
Will Trump turn out the same numbers he did in 2016 or more or less?
Its early... but we we get an indication that there is trouble for democrats at the moment.
2018 is most likely completely irrelevant.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/04/iowa-caucus-low-turnout-110674
....
And it wasn’t just the turnout totals that were worrisome for Democrats. It was the makeup of the electorate.
Entrance polls showed first-time caucus-goers down this year, to about one-third of all caucus-goers. That fell lower not only than 2008, when nearly 60 percent of caucus-goers were first-time participants, but also 2016.
It was a deflating acknowledgment for a party that is desperate to register and turn out first-time voters in the fall.