Rumorville

Quote from the1:

Unreported by the press, to the best of my knowledge, there were food riots in China around the 20th of Feb. because of the rapid increase in the price of commodities.

Why would China want to suppress the riot, let alone stop from being broadcast all around the globe? It would be in their own interest to spill the beans as it were.
 
Ummm....I think your looking at the wrong measurement of the money supply. Perhaps the one attached will make it a little more clear.

Quote from Covertibility:

Dollar index:
<IMG SRC=http://www.sharelynx.com/chartstemp/free/chartind1CRUvoi.php?ticker=FUTDX>

<IMG SRC=http://www.sharelynx.com/chartstemp/free/chartind1CRUvoi.php?ticker=FUTCT>

<IMG SRC=http://www.sharelynx.com/chartstemp/free/chartind1CRUvoi.php?ticker=FUTC>

<IMG SRC=http://www.sharelynx.com/chartstemp/free/chartind1CRUvoi.php?ticker=FUTKC>

The dollar was at a lower level in '08 than today and if we believe that the dollar is the sole reason for high commodity prices, then why is cotton and coffee signficantly higher today than at their '08 levels?
 

Attachments

Quote from olias:

Fair enough, I just get really tired of the over-simplification that is rampant around here. Such as "QE2 caused food prices to spike"

instead of being tired you should force you brain to work a little

so you maybe heard Bernanke wanted higher stocks? Actually I thnik he wanted higher house prices

Although you should know desired assets grow faster than not desired
so if we rate assets they will be in the following order
1. commodities
2. stocks
3. housing

Bernanke takes credit for high stock prices but denies for commodity. But it's just impossible in this economic situation

either he is responsible for commodities or not responsible for stocks

in both cases he is just a liar
 
<i>"Bernanke takes credit for high stock prices but denies for commodity. But it's just impossible in this economic situation"</i>

Isn't this the truth. He publicly stated higher stock prices would generate a "wealth effect" but as inflation pushes stock prices higher it also pushes commodity prices higher. There's always a trade-off. The markets are very efficient. Yes, you are richer, assuming you are actually in the markets, but it's going to cost you more at the pump and the grocery store so are you really richer?

There's another major flaw with The Bernank's strategy. The public is just getting back into the stock market now. Mutual funds do their buying and selling at the end of the day and if you've been watching the markets closely lately you would have noticed the markets have been going vertically upward during the last 30 min's. There is strong participation from the retail investors now...now that we've probably topped. Oops. So much for the wealth effect.

Quote from kashirin:

instead of being tired you should force you brain to work a little

so you maybe heard Bernanke wanted higher stocks? Actually I thnik he wanted higher house prices

Although you should know desired assets grow faster than not desired
so if we rate assets they will be in the following order
1. commodities
2. stocks
3. housing

Bernanke takes credit for high stock prices but denies for commodity. But it's just impossible in this economic situation

either he is responsible for commodities or not responsible for stocks

in both cases he is just a liar
 
How possible is the scenario where Benji plans on deflating the American debt through deflating the dollar through inflating Benji's supply?
 
Back
Top