ruining threads part II

[rs7]

Quote from max401:

a/k/a Moe, Larry and Curly...

Thank you boys, we now return to our regularly scheduled thread, the continuing saga, "Fantasy Island, Virtual Edition." This weeks episode stars RS7 in, "Choppers over Monte Carlo."

Max,

You had all week to verify or discredit the entire Monte Carlo thing. But instead of even attempting to find out the truth, you just go on and on in your feeble attempts to make me, and anyone else who catches your attention look bad.

Time to either deal with reality, or fade away. Both would be ideal, because that would benefit everyone. You, me, and all the others who are as foolish as I am and waste our time reading your venom.

Of course no one expects you to take this course. This would defeat your entire reason for being.

But to allude to the lives of others as "fantasy"....well, to the amusement of all, be our guest. You yourself live some shadowy existence. Fantasy at the very best. "Son of Sam" type reality more likely.

What possible reason could you have had to block out the city of issuance of "your" visa from France? No reason would make sense other than total paranoia.

So how about turning your loathing inward, where it belongs? You have spent so much time reading all my old posts. Why not go back and read what you yourself have written. You want to find the words that define true mental illness? It is all spelled out quite clearly for all to see. Even yourself. Enjoy!

Rs7

 

[max401]

Quote from rs7:

But to allude to the lives of others as "fantasy"....well, to the amusement of all, be our guest. You yourself live some shadowy existence. Fantasy at the very best. "Son of Sam" type reality more likely.

So you really think it is possible that I walk down streets seeking out certain hair specific females to brutally murder with a large bore handgun? Here is the description of Berkowitz' first two victims:

[size=-3]"On July 29, 1976 the Son of Sam saga began. Donna Lauria (18) and Jody Valenti (19) were sitting innocently in their car outside Lauria's Bronx apartment when Donna noticed a man peering into the window. "Who is this guy? What does he want?" Donna never lived to hear her questions answered. David Berkowitz pulled his .44 caliber Charter Arms Bulldog out of a paper bag and fired 5 times into the car. Donna died immediately. Laurie survived the attack and was able to give the first vague description of a man that was soon to be known as the .44 caliber killer. Police surmised that the attack was a mob attack or possibly a simple case of mistaken identity.

On October 23, 1976 Carl Denaro (20), Rosemary Keenan had just returned from a party and were parked near Rosemary's home , talking in Carl's red Volkswagen Beatle. David approached the car, again from the passenger's side, and fired 5 shots into the vehicle. Rosemary died instantly, Carl survived, recovering from a bullet wound to his head. At this point, a pattern had already begun to emerge. David Berkowitz struck out at women, most with long, flowing hair."[/size]

RS7, by your alluding to this brutal, cold-blooded murderer as having any similarity to a poster on ET, exposes the make up of your character. And it is now apparent that character is flawed to a degree worse than initially thought.

 

[rs7]

Quote from max401:

So you really think it is possible that I walk down streets seeking out certain hair specific females to brutally murder with a large bore handgun? Here is the description of Berkowitz' first two victims:

.RS7, by your alluding to this brutal, cold-blooded murderer as having any similarity to a poster on ET, exposes the make up of your character. And it is now apparent that character is flawed to a degree worse than initially thought.

First off, do I really think you are a serial murderer? Not likely, but anything is possible. Certainly you have demonstrated anti social behavior that would not preclude anything. However that was not what I meant. What I meant with my allusion to "Son of Sam" was just your total detachment from (and lack of regard for) reality. You have your own, and it has very little or nothing to do with what is generally accepted as such.

As far as what you think of MY character and it's flaws.....gee Max, this is real news to all! Your whole existence seems to be about pointing out my flaws, my "tall tales", whatever you see fit to find fault with in virtually every single post you make.

Have you ever made a post that said anything positive about anyone or anything? (It may be possible.... but I can't fathom going back and reading all of your posts like you have done with mine...is this a bit of a lack of obsession on my behalf? Or is it an overwhelming degree of obsession on yours?)

I will take Aphie's word and believe you have done all in your power to avoid contributing to ET in any constructive way. Unless of course you consider yourself a great public servant by your "policing" of all posts by specific members. In that case you have done a fine job!!!

PS: I will admit when I am wrong. And now, apparently I have found myself to have been in error. I would have bet that Max and SmokeyMcpaat were one and the same. But now I see they are both on line at the same time. So apparently there is more than one total misanthrope on ET. Nice for you guys that you have each other's company to share. Hoist a few on me....send me the tab. I will be MORE THAN HAPPY TO PAY IT!!!!

This also explains the sudden surge in the "normal" votes for max. Every vote counts!!!

 

[max401]

Quote from rs7:



First off, do I really think you are a serial murderer? Not likely, but anything is possible. Certainly you have demonstrated anti social behavior that would not preclude anything. However that was not what I meant. What I meant with my allusion to "Son of Sam" was just your total detachment from (and lack of regard for) reality. You have your own, and it has very little or nothing to do with what is generally accepted as such.

As far as what you think of MY character and it's flaws.....gee Max, this is real news to all! Your whole existence seems to be about pointing out my flaws, my "tall tales", whatever you see fit to find fault with in virtually every single post you make.

Have you ever made a post that said anything positive about anyone or anything? (It may be possible.... but I can't fathom going back and reading all of your posts like you have done with mine...is this a bit of a lack of obsession on my behalf? Or is it an overwhelming degree of obsession on yours?)

I will take Aphie's word and believe you have done all in your power to avoid contributing to ET in any constructive way. Unless of course you consider yourself a great public servant by your "policing" of all posts by specific members. In that case you have done a fine job!!!

PS: I will admit when I am wrong. And now, apparently I have found myself to have been in error. I would have bet that Max and SmokeyMcpaat were one and the same. But now I see they are both on line at the same time. So apparently there is more than one total misanthrope on ET. Nice for you guys that you have each other's company to share. Hoist a few on me....send me the tab. I will be MORE THAN HAPPY TO PAY IT!!!!

This also explains the sudden surge in the "normal" votes for max. Every vote counts!!!

You're the one who came up with the BS combat story, I challenged your veracity. You begged to be proven wrong. So I read your posts, past and present, and found you to be wanting in the truth department. You admitted your bull crap story was not the truth, but a complilation and that you hold more than one alias. Of course, now you proclaim that someone is "the board police" and must be "obsessed" to have dared to check your bull stories out for reality content.

So, I have to assume your message is "Don't check me out, because I always tell the truth, I'm RS7. And if you do, there is something wrong with you, because RS7 always tells it straight. If you need any verification, don't research the ET archives, just ask me, RS7."

And here's my message: You can continue to promote your "obsession" theory in a lame attempt to deflect the real issue. Again, this entire multi-thread/post dialogue is not about me, it's about your credibility; you don't have any.

 

[rs7]

Quote from max401:

You're the one who came up with the BS combat story, ....

..... this entire multi-thread/post dialogue is not about me, it's about your credibility; you don't have any.

OK Maxie....whatever. So I expressed what was a compilation for the sake of brevity. And I readily admitted it, and to YOU FIRST!....mistakenly thinking you were normal and would understand my reasoning.

So now, months have passed, and still you are obsessing.

Choose not to believe me. Who cares? Why do you NEED to disprove whatever I say? I mean, ok...you don't think I was in combat. And the fact is, that I wasn't supposed to be. I was in what was NOT supposed to be a combat zone. Yet I have a bullet scar. And I was very lucky that it hit me where it did.

But, all this aside. Let's say for whatever reason someone would make up a story about combat. (I mean there were only a few MILLION of us shipped there between 1965-1973, so yeah, the likelihood of my having been drafted is very remote )

What would this have to do with being called a fraud because I said I worked for a company that traded out of Monaco? You wanted to see my visa, and foolishly I showed it to you. Along with photos of my son on the beach in Monaco. Yet STILL, it is all a fraud. The photos were of, as you said a child implying not mine. Yet somehow this very same kid appears in photos taken in Menton.

You said I never skied in Chamonix, and again, I foolishly indulged you and scanned my ski pass. And your response? To distort the photo of me on the pass. Lot's of fun.........fine. Great, you had your big laughs with your clever manipulation of a photo. But the fact remains you asked for PROOF, and then you get it and deny it's veracity. Yet I ask ONE SINGLE QUESTION of you, and you are a clam. Secret Max! Can't say where you live. Can't tell us what you trade (if anything, which is doubtful), can't even let us see what city your visa was issued in. Amazing!!!!!

Well Max, I not only gave you photographic proof of events you claimed never could have happened, but the names of people in Chicago that you can easily call and verify the whole Monaco trading fiasco. But you don't. You just badger and harass.

Time to shit or get off the pot Max. Either prove yourself to be worth reading, or prove me to be full of BS. Make a real case about SOMETHING! All you have proven so far is that you are obsessed with me, and you are not even man enough to come forth and say ONE SINGLE TRUTH about YOUR LIFE.

I will gladly call you. I will gladly meet with you. I will gladly let you kiss my bullet wound, because it is very near my ass.

So either admit you are obsessed (if not to me than at least to yourself, and get some help), or find a new hobby. You have certainly proven you could use one or the other.

 

[nitro]

You guys remind me of this Star Trek episode:

http://www.startrek.com/library/tos_episodes/episodes_tos_detail_68700.asp

or this one:

http://www.startrek.com/library/tos_episodes/episodes_tos_detail_68800.asp

nitro

 

[rs7]

Quote from nitro:

You guys remind me of this Star Trek episode:

nitro

I have been told (mostly by my kids) that I was from outer space. Maybe this the best explanation yet of why I would so foolishly behave in such an unearthly manner (to respond to an evil alien )

Nitro, no matter what, I have only been trying to do what Max has been doing. He has been attempting to have fun at my expense by his relentless pursuit of ways in which to try and discredit me.

And in return, I have been trying to amuse myself by pointing out what are, so obviously to all, the absurd assertions that continue in the face of any "evidence" this person has been trying to seek out. Or more accurately, lack thereof.

But alas, it has ceased to be amusing, and it has degenerated into a sad situation. Here we have me.....guilty of "rising" to Max's "challenges" with no possible outcome other than his denying any validity to anything I say. Including being my own son's father.

On the other side, we have Max...guilty of constant baiting and insistence that "nothing can be real" unless it carries his stamp of approval (which no one has seen on any matter as of yet).

So, as you so insightfully alluded to with the "Star Trek resolution", obviously there truly is no end. Only a "resolution" that is circular and endless.

Thus, I throw in the proverbial towel and will let Max find happiness with a new "opponent". May Max's days of being an official "nemesis" be long and prosperous (in whatever ways that position provides "prosperity"). And exclusive of my life. And hopefully after having diligently studied all my posts, perhaps he is (rightfully, and finally) getting bored with me anyway. There are always new "victims" to stalk.

Happy Hunting Max.
rs7

 

[max401]

RS7, I’m not sure I quite got this right. Could you explain this Chamonix thing? I know you don’t like to bring Chamonix up because you’re worried that people might think you were obsessed with Chamonix or something. BTW, is December Chamonix Awareness Month? I seem to be seeing Chamonix alot lately.

12/14/02 - You said I never skied in Chamonix, and again, I foolishly indulged you and scanned my ski pass.

12/10/02 - By the way, we rented the car in Geneva and spent a week in Chamonix where you said I never could have been. Subsequently I posted a scanned copy of my lift ticket...

12/06/02 - I didn't need one when I went to Chamonix in 1978...

12/04/02 - You asked for photographic "proof" and I got, in return, abusive doctoring of my picture on the Chamonix ski pass.

12/04/02 - and didn't ski in Chamonix? (even after I foolishly played your game and scanned my lift pass and posted it).

12/03/02 - I said that in Chamonix I found the people...

12/02/02 - Yet friendly in Chamonix .

10/18/02 - And since we were in Chamonix right after the wedding...

10/18/02 - Chamonix is only 60 miles from Geneva...

10/17/02 - I rode the tram in Chamonix up Mt. Blanc...

10/16/02 - I was in Chamonix for 2 weeks, and the people...

07/16/02 - I would probably take Alaska myself over Chamonix.

 

[max401]

First he claims that it is his own self in his ridiculous combat story.

Then he says that it's his and the stories of others (plural) combined.

Then he says that it's his and his brother-in-law's stories.

He talks about his "Vietnam" experiences, but by RS7's own admission-- he never went to Vietnam.

Here's the laugh of the week from the RS7 archives:

9-20-02 "I was captured. I was imprisoned, and I was shot escaping."

I think he should change his name to RS007. OR better yet, BS7.

 

[rs7]

Quote from max401:

I seem to be seeing Chamonix alot lately.

Quote from max401:

He talks about his "Vietnam" experiences, but by RS7's own admission-- he never went to Vietnam.

OK, here we go.

A: Obviously December IS Chamonix awareness month. Says so right here in the current issue of "Compulsive's Monthly". interestingly, the "month" consists of a time period that is inclusive of all moments from July through December. But calendars are the field of expertise of Thunderbolt and Max401. Not me. I only know what I see and read in the valuable posts and critically acclaimed publications I am privy to.

B: For the millionth time....a compilation is just that. Look up the word. I did indeed say I was NOT in COMBAT in VIETNAM. Make of it all what you will (as if I can impact in any way what conclusions you will reach about anything).

C: It is obvious that you are not obsessed with me. Clearly your dated quotes in which you refer to Chamonix show that your interest in me and what I have done, said I have done, (including travel, jobs, family, whatever) are of no more than a very small passing interest on your behalf.

As any non-partial observer can clearly see, it must be my insanity and not Max's that forces him to pour over every word of every post looking for whatever it is he looks for. All as a greatly appreciated public service. Certainly there can be no obsession, because these issues are of great importance to all. And the significance will affect the future of our planet. So Max is only being helpful to all of mankind. Generations yet unborn will owe Max a debt of gratitude for his diligence. On behalf of all; living, dead, and yet to be born, I (as should we all) thank Max for making the world a better place. For his altruistic efforts which have greatly cut into his valuable personal time. For being at the forefront of a badly needed preemptive effort to avoid worldwide destruction (or worse) by devoting his time, effort and keen sense of observation to the pursuit of a grander goal. To save the world from any inconsistencies ever posted by RS7. To dispute any invalid opinions of Aphie, or ElCubano, or Optional777, or Stu, or so many others of the other very ominous potential threats to civilization. Hail Max!!!! God bless Max. He has delivered us from evil. Just in time for Christmas. And with a holiday spirit to boot! Max will surely be on Santa's list of who was "good" and who was "nice". He is the champion of the underdog. The upholder of good and a credit to humanity.

I hope I have made myself clear. If I have left out any accolades, it is purely because I have not the clarity of expression and comprehensive thought ability of our exalted Max401. But I tried.

Happy holidays to all.

Peace,
rs7