Quote from max401:
[Then you have no honor.
Gee, and I am a broken record?
Scan a few pictures of olâ Greg and you.
Yes, well we see the results of me scanning anything for you.
I have no honor? Christ, you cast doubt on the veracity of photos of my son when he was four. And your use of my picture on my Chamonix ski pass? Sure, I can't wait to scan more pictures for you!!!
Which brings me to ask you once again....why are you so secretive about yourself? Had to blank out even the city of issuance of your French visa? What, or whom are you hiding from?
Never claimed Cher was a pal. An armslength acquaintance at best.
Knowing someone does NOT mean they are your "pal". Greg was a friend. Cher was just another Aspen local I knew to say "hi" to. Know what that is like?
Passport full of stamps? I don't think we even slowed down at half the borders. Asking for a stamp was putting the border guards out. You, of course, should know this. As you seem to know virtually everything else.
FYI, the only country to ever require a visa for the last 30 years or so, was France from about early 1987 to around 1990.
Oh, I didn't know that. I thought it was because, as you stated previously, the result of the Pan Am bombing in Dec. of '88. This would certainly explain why you would need a visa in early '87
You have no proof. The lift ticket doesn'tât mean you skied Vallee Blanche (not âBlancâ). Is the person in the ski pass in the photo of Vallee Blanche? No description of the ride up? No mention of lightheadedness at around 10,000 feet?
Got me there. I bought the pass in anticipation of needing to show it to some freak on the internet 24 years later. Not for skiing. Lightheaded at 10,000 feet....maybe I was
acclimated when I got there because Aspen was my home. But of course you know that not to be true too. Amazing what you have deduced!
Itâs two pictures of a child and a scan of a visa.
Same answer as above. All my master plan to fool a freak on the internet, but in that case only 13 years later rather than 24. Cute kid though....you gotta admit!
Sounds like you have intimate knowledge to me. âI happen to be quite familiar with the Mark Rich fiasco, and I assure you it had NOTHING to do with a âbribe.ââ
True. 100%.!!! And unfortunately for your obsessive desire to know, some things must remain confidential. Sorry to disappoint you. Ask me again in 10 years or so.
I said what my wife did for a living.
Every chance you get. But it's because you love her.
No argument from me here. We finally are on the same page on
something
Your problem is that you canât prove anything.
True, not to you. Nothing is "proof"' to you. Your assertion that my son is not my son, but just "a child"..(a rent-a-kid?)...well that's right up there with Thunderbolt explaining how the calendar is "proof" of the existence and deity of Jesus. A fine example of logic winning out over reason. I mean honestly, who in their right mind would ever believe that kid on the beach in Monaco was mine? Got me again!
RS7, humble you ain't.
Guilty as charged. So now what? How do I make amends? I am open to suggestions. Help me to become a better person. Give me some guidance. Please?
Max, when will this end? Have you called Tim Mullin yet at FOC? How 'bout Mary Beth Shea? It is abundantly obvious that your schedule is pretty full, and your time at a great premium. But somehow I still have to believe that making a few phone calls would require not that much more time than scouring every word of 1500+ posts. Give it a shot. And then PM me your phone number and I will give you all the rest of what you want to know (except the Marc Rich thing).
Peace Max,

rs7