[/QUOTE]Quote from Trader666:
Then why hasn't he posted since March when his last post said it wasn't consistently profitable? I'd think he would be singing your praises.
Yes, Yes and Yes.
Why would he do anything like that?
I am sure he has the same standards you do. You never do any singing about the cash cow results on those charts.
This is inconsistent and only Basic as a foundation. All software ATS's need to be developed by going through the standard industry development.
Can you see that only a few trades were done and the signals are only consistent in that NO fractal jumping is going on. Some of those hold periods go on for hours at a time. they do make most of the trading range each traverse, but that is not too swift is it? Scaling out and scaling in could be added to lessen the profits and make it more like a quanht operation.
Do you see that the bar of the trade always gives up (meaning loses) the traded bar volatility.
There is NO price Action involved as yet. We aren't going to add price action but we ARE going to ADD three more shells to the Basic Cash Cow.
We only turn this around once a day as our process. Right now we are doing a nomenclature up date to make sure all three pats are consistent.
You may notice that the daily multiple of the ATR is quite low.
I think my IB costs were a little high and I might have missed by a factor of 20 instead of 10 on the net for the day.