Quote from Trader666:
That's not consistent with what ScottD wrote about it. Apparently he did think it was an accomplishment. Which may be why he got sucked into wasting four months of his life with your "methods."
Recently Jack Hershey suggested that someone post an S&P 500 futures chart with only Volume, MACD(5,13,6), Stochastic(14,1,3) and Stochastic(5,2,3) â but not Price. Jack said that he would demonstrate how to trade it profitably.
Sounded interesting, so I posted a price-less chart. I threw a curveball (pun intended) and posted a US 10 Year Treasury Notes futures chart instead of S&P 500 futures. In addition, I removed the time and price axes and up/down volume color coding.
As it turns out, Jack realized it was not the ES and was able to identify successful trades, capturing significant profits.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2213671#post2213671
Oh really? Where exactly are they doing that? ScottD's last post on ET was a status report in March where he wrote it wasn't working:
Each logic release has had some profitable days and flashes of brilliance, but the logic has not been profitable over a sustained multi-week forward test or multi-month back test period.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2357209#post2357209
We all got over the initial euphoria of the initial interaction and we had to settledown and put our shoulders to the dashboard and its lighting.
We waited two days for rain and we had kites of all colors and keys attached to our kite strings.
Finally, at midnight the rains precipitated the components, the degrees of freedom and a lot if kite strings got mixed up and it was hard to unravel them.
Also our keg got hit by lightening and blew the bung hole wide open.
Duty bound, we reported out our work. We chose the background color of ET for all numbering right then and there since is just dawned on us after missing a whole night's sleep.