This is just another example of that great "investigative journalism" the post is know for.Flashback: WaPo Document Expert
Said Forged Roy Moore Yearbook
‘Consistent with One Writer’
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 12/8/2017 6:43:18 PM Post Reply
Three weeks ago, in a partisan effort to dismiss what is now an admitted forgery, and what at the time was an obvious forgery, the left-wing Washington Post’s Philip Bump (already a proven liar) consulted former FBI agent Mark Songer, a forensics documents examiner, to examine a yearbook produced by one of Roy Moore’s accusers as evidence he assaulted her. The expert concluded that the “writing seems consistent with one writer.” The context of when Bump published this piece is important.........

This is now fake news
http://thehill.com/homenews/media/3...n-roy-moore-accuser-yearbook-forgery-headline
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...n-attributed-to-alabama-senate-candidate.html
1st clue should have been it was coming from Fox. But most smart people know that already.
Whoa, a news agency offering a correction with an apology?... It's almost as if they're a legitimate source that upholds a standard.
This is now fake news
http://thehill.com/homenews/media/3...n-roy-moore-accuser-yearbook-forgery-headline
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...n-attributed-to-alabama-senate-candidate.html
1st clue should have been it was coming from Fox. But most smart people know that already.