Ross Hooks (or other patterns) entries based off of stop loss distance

As you can see what appears as chop on the 500 is a consolidating buy zone-9ema above the 30wma on the 1500, so the two higher lows on the 500 could have been long entries based on the 1500

HOWEVER
 
Last edited:
The red arrow down on the highest (and most powerful time frame) the 4500 is in a SELL zone so I am looking for a short entry in the 500 congestion. Either the lower high marked by the first red arrow or the divergent double test (second red arrow) on the 500t would be acceptable entries. The trade went about 15 points until it put in a higher low on the 4500 to begin an uptrend.
The point as discussed before is what appears as "chop" is pullback on a higher tf. While the short entry zone was part of a higher high on the 4500, it was still in my sell zone with lower tf's momentum rolling over.
upload_2017-7-25_22-6-48.png
 
I find candles a little noisy and needless to say, they offer the same information as bars.


I dislike candles, myself: of course, both give exactly the same information, but with candles the visual emphasis is strongly on the opens and closes (which are subjective and user-defined) whereas with bars it's on the highs and lows (which are objective and factual).

Maybe I'm biased through trading price action, but for me OHLC or HLC bars are way easier to use.
 
Nice to see someone using bars instead of candles. :)
You might find it interesting that while charts are still printed using candles in Japan, the candlestick pattern analysis that they invented is virtually dead here in Japan.
 
Last edited:
You might find it interesting that while charts are still printed with candles in Japan

My printer doesn't take candles, rather ink cartridges, but that's a cool invention - only in Japan I guess, the leaders in technical innovation ;)
 
The red arrow down on the highest (and most powerful time frame) the 4500 is in a SELL zone so I am looking for a short entry in the 500 congestion. Either the lower high marked by the first red arrow or the divergent double test (second red arrow) on the 500t would be acceptable entries. The trade went about 15 points until it put in a higher low on the 4500 to begin an uptrend.
The point as discussed before is what appears as "chop" is pullback on a higher tf. While the short entry zone was part of a higher high on the 4500, it was still in my sell zone with lower tf's momentum rolling over.
View attachment 176007

Very insightful, and great explanation. Thank you for that.
I will be digesting that for a bit.

One thought, if the larger TF (4500) has more significance than the middle TF (1500), when/what do you really use the middle TF for? It seems as though you could have done a trade based off of the 500 and 4500. (I realize the 1500 offers more information, but it just seemed a mute point in this example as it signaled buy)
 
Very insightful, and great explanation. Thank you for that.
I will be digesting that for a bit.

One thought, if the larger TF (4500) has more significance than the middle TF (1500), when/what do you really use the middle TF for? It seems as though you could have done a trade based off of the 500 and 4500. (I realize the 1500 offers more information, but it just seemed a mute point in this example as it signaled buy)
I will take a setup off of any of the three charts, it depends on the price action and momentum dynamics across all three. The 4500 is not in play nearly as often as the others but when it is, it's wise to pay attention.
 
I will take a setup off of any of the three charts, it depends on the price action and momentum dynamics across all three. The 4500 is not in play nearly as often as the others but when it is, it's wise to pay attention.

Do you ever take trades against the 4500 if momentum is showing different than the 2 lower TFs?
 
Back
Top