Because this is how it works, you make a claim then I prove the opposite.
LOL
Bye bye troll
No your the one making a claim there is a difference between liberal and conservative Muslims (who are all supremacists, btw ), distinguished mainly by the acceptable age of consent for sexual relations (you've claimed the conservatives have perverted consent limits).
The reason you won't go there is because you know the founding father of Islamo-supremacism considered consent (for sexual relations) to be around age 11 and age for marriage to be even lower.
As an ex-Canadian Brit, you are fast fitting the profile of an Islamo-supremacist suffering from cognitive dissonance in regards this issue. You don't want to insult your prophet, but also don't want to go below your own, personally preferable age limits for consent (for sexual relations). It must be low because it has nothing to do with the legal age of any given country, and is low enough you don't want to admit it. Anything lower than your own personal preferences is considered "conservative", and defines your prophet as perverted.
This is relevant to the topic of this thread, wherein the biggest detractors of Trump, in this forum, aren't even from the US, not qualified to vote, nor registered as foreign agents while infiltrating social media toward dominating US political culture (and influencing US elections).
There are other threads for Michelle's sexual orientations, and Barack's religio-supremacistical orientations. I have only floated the possibilities/probabilities to measure your responses...to see if you fit a particular brand of Islamo-supremacist cult-ure. While I had never heard of liberal Muslims (versus conservative) the way you have described them, it appears you come from a self-defined (private definition) "liberal" Islamic background, as a second generation immigrant.
As such, it is easier for you to float labels and flee, rather than answer the charges (or the questions).