Ron Paul unimpressed with Limbaugh apology

[Hombre]

Quote from jem:

No govt intervention in our private lives is what makes business and people self sufficient.

Just as there should be no bailouts of wall street because it created to big to fail on other moral hazards...

the same goes for our citizens.

If the govt was not supporting a huge expensive underclass there would not be a huge underclass.

You know why we did not have so many children out of wedlock 50 years ago....

Because the govt was not paying people to be irresponsible.

There always will be an underclass. All their manufacturing jobs are gone, they have no capacity to do anything else so here we are. They will never be self sufficient . Ever.

 

[Hombre]

Quote from Mercor:

If the pill was to lead towards planned parenthood then it has failed.
There are more unintended pregnancies then ever before.
There are more abortions then ever before.

If the pill was successful then the need for abortions should have dropped sharply

i agree with you but what is the solution to control the overpopulation by low IQ people unable to tend for themselves in the high tech workforce ?
Abortions and pills are needed.

 

[Max E.]

LOL

Quote from futurecurrents:


.......someone as intelligent as trefoil....

 

[Brass]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

As always Paul calls out the bull shit.Everyone knows his apology was not sincere but Paul is one of the few on the right with the balls to call him on bs apology

Quite right. And although I vehemently disagree with many of Ron Paul's political views, I respect and admire his integrity.

 

[Brass]

Quote from Maverick74:

The irony here is this. The left is always saying they want the government out of our bedrooms. Now they are saying they want the government to finance what we do in our bedrooms. Can these hypocritical pos liberals just shut the f*ck up already...

Once again, you got it exactly wrong. It's the church that wants to hold sway in the bedrooms of the country. It seeks not only to "lovingly teach," but to implicitly impose, even upon those who are not necessarily adherents. Is the church being too subtle for you?

 

[Maverick74]

Quote from Brass:

Once again, you got it exactly wrong. It's the church that wants to hold sway in the bedrooms of the country. It seeks not only to "lovingly teach," but to implicitly impose, even upon those who are not necessarily adherents. Is the church being too subtle for you?

I don't agree with the church for doing that but it's their first amendment right to voice that opinion. The government does not have that right though. Do you really want the federal government in your bedroom. Gabby, once they underwrite the process do you really think it will be unconditional? If you truly want to be free, don't take the money.

 

[OccupyThis]

Quote from Brass:

Once again, you got it exactly wrong. It's the church that wants to hold sway in the bedrooms of the country. It seeks not only to "lovingly teach," but to implicitly impose, even upon those who are not necessarily adherents. Is the church being too subtle for you?

It's only the dumb fucks in life who seek out a religious organization that stands against their belief system and then complain about it after enrolling.

Gee, how about you simply make a different fucking choice!?

 

[Brass]

Quote from Maverick74:

I don't agree with the church for doing that but it's their first amendment right to voice that opinion. The government does not have that right though. Do you really want the federal government in your bedroom. Gabby, once they underwrite the process do you really think it will be unconditional? If you truly want to be free, don't take the money.

Except in this case, it is the government that wants freedom and equality for its citizenry, whereas the church wants some element of ideological control.

 

[Maverick74]

Quote from Brass:

Except in this case, it is the government that wants freedom and equality for its citizenry, whereas the church wants some element of ideological control.

OK, let me put it a different way. You let the government in your bedroom because you took their money. Then Rick Santorum shows up and tells you how you can use that money. See, this is what you guys don't understand. Everything Bush did during his term was using powers that democrats created years before. The only way to truly have liberty and freedom is never to give government that power. Now you might like President Obama and think he would never do such things but one day someone might be in office that might put conditions on that money. It's best not to give the government that power to begin with.

 

[OccupyThis]

Quote from Brass:

Except in this case, it is the government that wants freedom and equality for its citizenry, whereas the church wants some element of ideological control.

Who the fuck is forcing you to attend?