Israel has plenty of firepower to defend themselves.
Ron Paul: If Iran nukes Israel, as president I would do nothing.
- Thread starter Grandluxe
- Start date
When did Obama Reid and Pelosi say we would be completely out of Irag and Afghanistan years ago ?
That's the most important point.
Israel has hundreds of nukes, many of which are on submarines deep beneath the ocean, on airplanes circling the skies, on ships at sea equipped with long-range cruise missiles, etc., etc.
A first strike by Iran would result in dozens of Israeli nukes raining down on Tehran and every other major Iranian city.
Israel has hundreds of nukes, many of which are on submarines deep beneath the ocean, on airplanes circling the skies, on ships at sea equipped with long-range cruise missiles, etc., etc.
A first strike by Iran would result in dozens of Israeli nukes raining down on Tehran and every other major Iranian city.
Which is why Paul said this...
PAUL: No. Iâd let Israel take care of âem. Why should we interfere with Israel?
Its not to late to get on the Paul bandwagon
Well, he can spread his legs pretty far I'm assuming...
1 foot is not on the Obama bandwagon
liberals are anti war social libertarians so they are not as far apart as you keep proclaiming them to be
Quote from Lucrum:
And yet you're constantly defending him and have said repeatedly you'll vote for him if Paul doesn't get the nomination.
You have a foot on the BO bandwagon whether you have the honesty to admit it or not.
Not being on the Bachmann,Perry or Romney bandwagon dosent mean I'm on the Obama bandwagon
When I would vote for Paul over Obama or any democrat who ran a primary challenge against Obama that means I'm not on Obamas bandwagon