Romney's Libya Line Fuels Foreign Policy Doubts

[mrbill]

Quote from CaptainObvious:

Neither is Obama, but we're stuck with him anyway. Romney may or may not be able to do a better job. What we know for a fact is Obama is clearly in over his head. The question becomes, do we take a chance on a guy who might do better, or do we stick with a guy we know will do worse? Seems simple enough.

Again, I prefer a President who Responds instead of just knee-jerk Reacting, albeit from his handlers. And, with so many changes in his policies, and I hate the term Flip Flop, but since he nothing of substance that has stood the test of even his candidacy, it really worries me. You have a spin around guy being controlled by the old Bush war mongers, not a good thing. If we had a Romney type during the last few years we would likely be in more wars, not fewer.

 

[Brass]

Quote from CaptainObvious:

Neither is Obama, but we're stuck with him anyway. Romney may or may not be able to do a better job. What we know for a fact is Obama is clearly in over his head. The question becomes, do we take a chance on a guy who might do better, or do we stick with a guy we know will do worse? Seems simple enough.

You mean take a chance on the guy who keeps stepping in it whichever way he turns? And then doubles down with the other foot?

Perhaps Obama's new campaign strategy should simply be to keep Romney talking.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Brass:

You mean take a chance on the guy who keeps stepping in it whichever way he turns? And then doubles down with the other foot?

Like WE did in 2008?

 

[Brass]

Quote from mrbill:

Again, I prefer a President who Responds instead of just knee-jerk Reacting, albeit from his handlers. And, with so many changes in his policies, and I hate the term Flip Flop, but since he nothing of substance that has stood the test of even his candidacy, it really worries me. You have a spin around guy being controlled by the old Bush war mongers, not a good thing. If we had a Romney type during the last few years we would likely be in more wars, not fewer.

 

[Brass]

Quote from Lucrum:

Like WE did in 2008?

Exactly. The Palin/McCain ticket lost.

 

[Spike Trader]

Quote from Brass:



Perhaps Obama's new campaign strategy should simply be to keep Romney talking.

His Olympic messup is still fresh in the minds of the International Community.

 

[Lucrum]

The Hilda Beast is busy apologizing to the Muslims, again.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Brass:

Exactly. The Palin/McCain ticket lost.

So did the US and it's taxpayers.

 

[CaptainObvious]

But this kind of indecisiveness is OK? I've got news for the president. If Egypt is neither an ally or an enemy, in that part of the world, they're the enemy. Nice we keep sinking billions of dollars into a country that is clearly not going in the direction of an ally. If this is what passes for foreign policy expertise, I'll take my chances on the new guy.
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-egypt-not-ally-enemy-122704386.html

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from CaptainObvious:

...Nice we keep sinking billions of dollars into a country that is clearly not going in the direction of an ally.

Billions we don't even have and borrow before we give them away for nothing I might add.

If this is what passes for foreign policy expertise, I'll take my chances on the new guy.

I'd vote for a monkey wearing a necktie before I'd vote for the Obama disaster. ANYONE would be better.