Romney's fundraisers are quietly amassing millions

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Obama currently has and will have more money but bravo for Romney :)
More...

Yep, it will end up probably at about 3:1 because Obama will likely get to about $750MM.

The ratio would be even higher if there was an accurate way to account for all the "free stuff" that the Obama campaign gets. Not that I fault Obama for that. It is just an advantage for the incumbent.
 
Quote from Max E. Pad:

This is more great news, if Obama is going to try to play class warfare, and the democrats are going to play this bullshit game about a war on women, then it is good to know that the people who are footing the bill for all of their spending have a way to fight back. The entire media except for Fox news is in the tank for Obama so this is the only way to fight back, and get equal air time.

Democrats have tried to turn democracy into a game, of buying votes using the 10% of people who pay taxes money, of course all the people who dont have to pay for the shit that they propose are going to vote for the free ice cream that the democrats offer them, so its nice to know that the minority, (people who actually work and pay taxes) can fight back.

I hope Romney raises 5 billion and fucking buries Obama in negative advertising, I cant think of anyone who deserves it more than Obama. :D
More...

I've never contributed at the Presidential level but I will this summer. I'll bet many other middle class people do as well.

Romney doesn't need to negative campaign, he can state the truth of what has occurred: Foreign Policy Buffoonery, Broken Promise to End the Wars, Broken Promise to Close Gitmo, Broken Promise to End Torture, Failed Economic Policy, Racially Biased Department of Justice, Blantantly Criminal Export of Assault Weapons to Drug Cartels, Intentional Division of the Country, Class Warfare, Failed Energy Policy, Increased Fuel Prices....

The truth will be sufficient.

Many idiots will vote again for Obama but they're going to have to get used to the idea that it will be an awfully long time before a Marxist-Leftist Radical is elected again in this country, probably generations.
 
Quote from Brass:

Yes, best to vent your hubris now while you still can before November
More...

Nobody here cares what you say Faghag. Your credibility is zero, zip, zilch, nada. Piss off back to Canada and worry about your own politics you freak.
 
Super PAC are going to have a huge amount of influence though. I think Romney has a big advantage there. Obama has a small donor advantage, although it is nothing like it was in 2008. There is only one first time for anything, and then many of the activist small donors dry up.

It has been suggested that there is around $300MM already raised and waiting for the eventual GOP nominee. But many of the big hitters on the Dem side have suggested that they won't be looking to donate to Obama Super PACs this time around, including Lewis and Soros, who have both indicated that they won't be donating much to the Obama effort. I'm wondering if that isn't in part a result of Obama harshly condemning large donors during the last race. He had a huge small donation advantage, so he chose to criticize his rivals for accepting large donations, suggesting that there shouldn't be any room for big money donors in politics. This time around he is having a much harder time raising small donations, so he is actively targeting the big money. But many of them say they are more committed to funding the progressive agenda than the Obama re-election.
 
Quote from 377OHMS:

I don't look at links you post.

Just noting that you must have an awfully empty life to need a hobby obsessing about the politics of a foreign country. Quite the obscure past-time, like your faghaggery, it isn't something normal people do.
More...

Horses brASS is obviously an angry lonely little man leading an utterly miserable pathetic existence.
 
Quote from Epic:

I'm wondering if that isn't in part a result of Obama harshly condemning large donors during the last race. He had a huge small donation advantage, so he chose to criticize his rivals for accepting large donations, suggesting that there shouldn't be any room for big money donors in politics.
More...
it has more to do with the fact that obama has demonstrated that he is really closer to a moderate republican than a democrat.
 
Quote from Free Thinker:

it has more to do with the fact that obama has demonstrated that he is really closer to a moderate republican than a democrat.
More...
And yet you vehemently support BO anyway.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top