Let me guess you always failed the what doesn't belong part of sesame street and analogies are an enigma for you.Quote from RCG Trader:
IQ measures the size of the dog in the fight, NOT the size of the fight in the dog, fool. I would think that would be self evident.
Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:
Let me guess you always failed the what doesn't belong part of sesame street and analogies are an enigma for you.
Self-evident to those devoid of higher IQ.(yes you ricter, rcg , ak you all failed the test)
Here's why you are wrong.
IQ is an endogenous factor directly measuring"quality".
So the "fight" in the dog is CLEARLY represented by IQ.
Whereas the "size" of the dog is one of physical dimensions telling you "nothing " about the quality of ability.
sheesh
Well he screwed the pooch on this one for the sake of peer pressure then.Quote from jem:
let me say as dense as some of ricters arguments are, he poses them as part of a very strategic leftist plan. ricter thinks in systems and anticipates arguments by a step or more... consequently I am pretty sure his IQ is above average... probably well above. he is a worthy foe.
Quote from jem:
let me say as dense as some of ricters arguments are, he poses them as part of a very strategic leftist plan. ricter thinks in systems and anticipates arguments by a step or more... consequently I am pretty sure his IQ is above average... probably well above. he is a worthy foe.
Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:
For someone who claims to have a high IQ yourself , you certainly have the reading comprehension of a fvcking tard.
Quote from jem:
let me say as dense as some of ricters arguments are, he poses them as part of a very strategic leftist plan. ricter thinks in systems and anticipates arguments by a step or more... consequently I am pretty sure his IQ is above average... probably well above. he is a worthy foe.