Romney Looks Like the Next Pres

Quote from 377OHMS:

I've noticed. Bad upbringing or just complete lack of character?

Probably both along with some hard core leftist indoctrination during college.
 
Quote from Brass:

I already provided you with historical evidence that tax cuts do not pay for themselves. I have shown you evidence for evolution. I have given you links hinting at abiogenesis, where organic compounds were synthesized from inorganic precursors in laboratory conditions.

And you still don't see any of it. Jem, you couldn't find your ass using a mirror at the end of a stick. How could you possibly make good on a bet when you don't even understand its outcome?


You are still lying.
1. lie.
You did not provide evidence... you provided a link to slate which stated that revenues went up just not as much as their model.
Now according to the terms of the deal I made... you should leave et. As you have produced not data or facts.

2. deception
I taught you that there is no proof that life evolved from non life.
I do not deny some evolution. Before I came to ET and read the links of some of the honest thinkers here... I fully believed in evolution.

Note... inorganic to organic is not - non life evolving to life. Which is what we were arguing over.

Organic means almost nothing. Its is a throwback word to alchemy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_compound
Vitalism
The word "organic" is historical, dating back to the 1st century.[citation needed] For many centuries, Western alchemists believed in vitalism. This is the theory that certain compounds could be synthesized only from their classical elements — Earth, Water, Air, and Fire — by action of a "life-force" (vis vitalis) possessed only by organisms. Vitalism taught that these "organic" compounds were fundamentally different from the "inorganic" compounds that could be obtained from the elements by chemical manipulation.
Vitalism survived for a while even after the rise of modern atomic theory and the replacement of the Aristotelian elements by those we know today. It first came under question in 1824, when Friedrich Wöhler synthesized oxalic acid, a compound known to occur only in living organisms, from cyanogen.[citation needed] A more decisive experiment was Wöhler's 1828 synthesis of urea from the inorganic salts potassium cyanate and ammonium sulfate. Urea had long been considered to be an "organic" compound, as it was known to occur only in the urine of living organisms. Wöhler's experiments were followed by many others, where increasingly complex "organic" substances were produced from "inorganic" ones without the involvement of any living organism.[citation needed]
 
Quote from jem:

You are insane.
1. lie.
You did not provide evidence... you provided a link to slate which stated that revenues went up just not as much as their model.

2. deception
I do not deny some evolution... I taught you that there is no proof that life evolved from not life.
Note... inorganic to organic is not - non life to life.

Organic means almost nothing. Its is a throwback word to alchemy...

Lying and deception is really all Horse's brASS has got.
 
Quote from PiggyBank:

...what's the problem tdog?
First, I said I wouldn't take any Internet Political Quotient test. Been there, done that. As for the bet, unless it is enforced by moderators who can ckeck IPs, the bet has no meaning. If Joe changes his mind, you'll be the second to know.
 
Quote from 377OHMS:

Your ability to judge character is basically nonexistent so I nor anyone else gives a rat's ass about your pronouncements.

You aren't significant to anyone here. You may continue to blether on into the void as you wish. Nobody is listening Gabs.

You demonstrated your idiocy by expecting mods to participate in a hare-brained schema. Everyone has seen your folly. You are doing the work for me lol.
I see you're all giddy, now that there can be no enforced bet. But the snail trail of your cowardice still glistens in the moonlight.
 
Quote from Brass:

First, I said I wouldn't take any Internet Political Quotient test. Been there, done that. As for the bet, unless it is enforced by moderators who can ckeck IPs, the bet has no meaning. If Joe changes his mind, you'll be the second to know.

You didn't say that when I originally posted the bet.. could that be because you thought it would be after the the election and had NO INTENTION of fulfilling your end of the deal?

I will straight up tell you I won't post for 3 months if I lose. you have my word.
 
Quote from jem:

You are still lying.
1. lie.
You did not provide evidence... you provided a link to slate which stated that revenues went up just not as much as their model.
Now according to the terms of the deal I made... you should leave et. As you have produced not data or facts.

2. deception
I taught you that there is no proof that life evolved from non life.
I do not deny some evolution. Before I came to ET and read the links of some of the honest thinkers here... I fully believed in evolution.

Note... inorganic to organic is not - non life evolving to life. Which is what we were arguing over.

Organic means almost nothing. Its is a throwback word to alchemy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_compound
Vitalism
The word "organic" is historical, dating back to the 1st century.[citation needed] For many centuries, Western alchemists believed in vitalism. This is the theory that certain compounds could be synthesized only from their classical elements — Earth, Water, Air, and Fire — by action of a "life-force" (vis vitalis) possessed only by organisms. Vitalism taught that these "organic" compounds were fundamentally different from the "inorganic" compounds that could be obtained from the elements by chemical manipulation.
Vitalism survived for a while even after the rise of modern atomic theory and the replacement of the Aristotelian elements by those we know today. It first came under question in 1824, when Friedrich Wöhler synthesized oxalic acid, a compound known to occur only in living organisms, from cyanogen.[citation needed] A more decisive experiment was Wöhler's 1828 synthesis of urea from the inorganic salts potassium cyanate and ammonium sulfate. Urea had long been considered to be an "organic" compound, as it was known to occur only in the urine of living organisms. Wöhler's experiments were followed by many others, where increasingly complex "organic" substances were produced from "inorganic" ones without the involvement of any living organism.[citation needed]
Jem, and I don't say this lightly, I think you are pathological. While I hurl insults at those who offend me, and although you have offended me as well, I genuinely think you go the extra mile in the direction of crazy.
 
Quote from PiggyBank:

You didn't say that when I originally posted the bet.. could that be because you thought it would be after the the election and had NO INTENTION of fulfilling your end of the deal?

I will straight up tell you I won't post for 3 months if I lose. you have my word.

IMO you give every indication of a man who does what he says he will do. I believe you.
 
Back
Top