Romney Looks Like the Next Pres

[377OHMS]

Quote from Brass:

PigBank, I don't care about your insight regarding my political orientation. I said what it is and if you don't like it or agree, then that is your burden to bear.

However, I will take the bet, but I do not only want to limit it to you. And I await Joe's response to my request for enforcement. I will bet others as well, and accept all takers. So, if you bet me one month and I lose, then I am off for one month. Or one year for one year. And if anyone else wants to chime in, you can add that much more time to my "sentence" if I lose. Therefore, unless someone chooses the "forever" option, there is no redundancy in my taking multiple bets. And since you guys hate me so much, here is your chance to gang up on me and collectively send me away for a long time with relatively little individual risk to yourselves. Talk it over among yourselves.

Joe is going to tell you to piss off and the rest of us don't give a damn what you do. If you stay we will abuse you. If you leave we will be pleased. That is about the extent of it.

You are so incredibly self-important that you think people are concerned with your actions and words. Nobody gives a fuck pal, trust me on that. Its not like you are in the same room as I and saying this stuff. That would be remedied instantly.

You're just an anonymous prat who has nothing better to do than be caustic and annoying. You are a tempest in a teacup Gabfly, at best.

 

[377OHMS]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:






Obama is leading in the polls in most of the toss up states

Can Obama win without Ohio?

I've read that Romney has a relatively easy path with the Electoral College that seems at odds with your chart. Any comment on that notion?

 

[PiggyBank]

Quote from Brass:

PigBank, I don't care about your insight regarding my political orientation. I said what it is and if you don't like it or agree, then that is your burden to bear.

However, I will take the bet, but I do not only want to limit it to you. And I await Joe's response to my request for enforcement. I will bet others as well, and accept all takers. So, if you bet me one month and I lose, then I am off for one month. Or one year for one year. And if anyone else wants to chime in, you can add that much more time to my "sentence" if I lose. Therefore, unless someone chooses the "forever" option, there is no redundancy in my taking multiple bets. And since you guys hate me so much, here is your chance to gang up on me and collectively send me away for a long time with relatively little individual risk to yourselves. Talk it over among yourselves.

just to clarify, i am not giving you 3-1 in your favor just for the hell of it.. u need to take the test and post your results in order for us to have a deal. I will accept the results no matter if I believe you are lying or not in your answers (i will still call u out) and my bet will still stand. reward stays in your favor.

Deal?

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from 377OHMS:

Can Obama win without Ohio?

I've read that Romney has a relatively easy path with the Electoral College that seems at odds with your chart. Any comment on that notion?

I disagree Romney has an easy path to 270.If you are referring to the thread you posted the writer said Romney needed to win many states that Obama has strong leads in


Here is Ohio.Even Republican favorite Rasmussen has Obama +4 there,Fox has him +6.Ohios republican governor ranks as one of the most unpopular governors in the country and has an approval rating lower then Obama









Even without Ohio Obama has a path to victory.He is leading in the polls and has a strong ground game already in place in most swing states

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from 377OHMS:

...I've read that Romney has a relatively easy path with the Electoral College that seems at odds with your chart.




Any comment on that notion?

 

[jem]

The electoral map will matter far more after the convention.
Plus I have seen maps with Romney in the lead.

Even King on CCN said it is far too close to call right now.

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

I disagree Romney has an easy path to 270.If you are referring to the thread you posted the writer said Romney needed to win many states that Obama has strong leads in


Here is Ohio.Even Republican favorite Rasmussen has Obama +4 there,Fox has him +6.Ohios republican governor ranks as one of the most unpopular governors in the country and has an approval rating lower then Obama









Even without Ohio Obama has a path to victory.He is leading in the polls and has a strong ground game already in place in most swing states

 

[jem]

Quote from Brass:

Watch the 4-minute video and pay close attention to the last several seconds of the video, particularly the last three words:

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/CgpOmkHZxQU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

you are whack job. for you leftist fools... this is a real example of a specious appeal to authority. (perhaps an appeal to paul ryan would be legit) Why listen to a political clown when you can go to the facts.



If you can show with facts (budget facts) that revenues did not go up after the tax cuts we discussed on the other thread I will leave et chit chat forever... if you do not present those facts you leave forever.

Is that a deal Brass or are you going to troll out?

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from jem:

The electoral map will matter far more after the convention.
Plus I have seen maps with Romney in the lead.

Even King on CCN said it is far too close to call right now.

Can you post a link to the maps you have seen Romnney in the lead .Thanks

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from Lucrum:

Obama already has 70 % odds being the incumbent and 100 % odds as every president has won re election during a time of war.
Throw in the odds of turning all these swing states around... you should take your head out of the sand

 

[jem]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Can you post a link to the maps you have seen Romnney in the lead .Thanks

here is one, I found very quickly on my first click.... but I have seen others.


http://blogs.the-american-interest....allup-tracking-poll-shows-narrow-romney-lead/

Game On: First Gallup Tracking Poll Shows Narrow Romney Lead
The election is still more than six months away, but the 2012 presidential campaign system is now officially underway: the Gallup organization has begun to release daily tracking polls.
The first poll shows Mitt Romney with a narrow lead over President Obama — Gallup describes it as a “statistical tie.” The Rasmussen poll, the other daily tracking poll available at this point, gives Romney a slightly larger lead.
Using our standard methods to convert a national poll into an electoral map, the current Gallup numbers would yield a narrow Romney victory in the Electoral College: 275 to 263 for the President.