Quote from atticus:
A smart trader would not refer to complete BS when the money line defies his argument. If you weren't completely FOS you'd show us your intrade ticket.
Quote from Brass:
Just check out any of jem's evolution denying posts and threads and his firm belief in ID. They dovetail quite nicely with his climate change denial posts and threads. Seriously.
Quote from Brass:
Are you saying you do not believe in "intelligent design?" State it here for the record so I can bookmark it.
Quote from jem:
I just explained to you why there is little to no edge in the intrade market.
But I will make it more clear... you have to discount the risk of war... or natural disaster...
Finally did you not comprehend that I would never purchase an intrade ticket... unless i thought the odds were so good and that I would win so much, I would not mind letting a law enforcement agent have potential proof of a crime.
Please stop with the equivocation and obfuscation. Just answer the question. If it helps, let me break it down into 2 easier questions:Quote from jem:
I am saying I separate out science from faith.
1. Nobel prize winners state...
a. we have no proof life evolved from non life but once we had life, we evolved.
... a subset of that understanding is that there was likely not enough time on earth for life to evolved... but science is looking for answers.
2.
I also state that Hawking and just about every other top cosmologist and physicist states... that if you just look at it from the perspective of our one universe... our universe looks incredibly fine tuned for life...
but.. most of theses scientists... hope or suspect we will find that:
a. this apparent fine tuning can be explained by the fact we will some day find almost infinite other universes or
b. science will find a theory of everything... which may explain we feel there is fine tuning.
note.
few if any trained top physicists deny the appearance of fine tuning.