romney. cant he get anything right?

[mrbill]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Most people know Romney imo.With a 100 days left if they dont know him they wont know him imo

2.registered voter polls does just fine imo

In 2008 NBC /WSJ had Obama over McCain in everyone of their polls from march to election day.8 out of the 9 polls were registered voters.This same poll has had Obama over Romney in every one of their polls this year

Thanks again for trying to show the unwashed and un read fools the truth.

I still haven't had any more bets, other than Jem, still some of my free money available for charity. Romney or Obama. I deal in facts, not lunacy.

Any takers?

 

[jem]

ak - you keep bringing up old off point polls.


The last election came in 35D/35R/35I
The polls with Obama in the lead are over sampling dems by 45D/37/R/18I

So if they were correct in 2008, it was because the sampling matched the electorate... Right now they are way off.

Because the dems have historically low voter enthusiasm... I expect the Rs to show up in greater force then Dems.

 

[Brass]

Quote from Lucrum:

What debate, Obama knows NOTHING of economics has done NOTHING of consequence to help the economy and has NO viable economic plan for the future.

Whereas you once used an economics text as a door stop. So that makes you the arbiter of all things economic, just as Palin has foreign policy credentials by virtue of reportedly seeing Russia from her kitchen window.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Brass:

Whereas you once used an economics text as a door stop. So that makes you the arbiter of all things economic, just as Palin has foreign policy credentials by virtue of reportedly seeing Russia from her kitchen window.

So...you still got nothing huh.

 

[mrbill]

Quote from Lucrum:

So...you still got nothing huh.

And, what do you have? Obviously nothing or you would be willing to make a bet for charity.

More crickets eh? Go ahead and take some time to find some obnoxious thing to say. The real thinkers just laugh anyway.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from mrbill:

And, what do you have? Obviously nothing or you would be willing to make a bet for charity.

More crickets eh? Go ahead and take some time to find some obnoxious thing to say. The real thinkers just laugh anyway.

Answered in another thread, dopey.

 

[mrbill]

Quote from Lucrum:

Answered in another thread, dopey.

Dopey huh, nice, very nice. How cute. As I said in another thread, you admit that Obama is a lock for 4 more years.

Now, I guess your side can say it's because of all the dumb American voters who don't know any better. Then what if Romney wins? Because those same voters just got smarter. How crazy.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from mrbill:

Dopey huh, nice, very nice. How cute. As I said in another thread, you admit that Obama is a lock for 4 more years.

Reading comprehension challenged are you? I said I don't know who will win and think it may be a closer race than most here seem to think.

 

[mrbill]

Quote from Lucrum:

Reading comprehension challenged are you? I said I don't know who will win and think it may be a closer race than most here seem to think.

You said "Why would anyone, let alone a "real trader", take the other side of an "obvious" loser?"

I agree, you shouldn't take a bad bet. It's just that I get tired of all the guffaw and no substance to the Romney supporters.

I understand that it's hard for anyone to support Romney, being serious here, not being a dick. Even those in his own party wish they had someone else. I just don't care for the hatred of Obama's faked persona, as provided by Fox, Rove and crew, as opposed to the reality of his administration.

He'll win likely, nothing is for sure, but the way to bet, right?

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from mrbill:

You said "Why would anyone, let alone a "real trader", take the other side of an "obvious" loser?"

I put obvious in quotation marks because YOU said it was "obvious'.
NOT me. I went on to say I don't know who is going to win and that my guess is it will be a close race. Again, your reading comprehension is deplorable.