Romney 50%, Obama 43%

Quote from 377OHMS:

Who the fuck are you and why are you talking to me?

Noted response. I was pretty clear in the assignment. I believe you mentioned another poster, Brass, failed to pay off or something. As I said, this is just an academic indulgence. Trying to help my brother.
 
Quote from indythink75:

...I believe you mentioned another poster, Brass, failed to pay off or something...
I never failed to "pay off or something." But people who have nothing must fabricate and mischaracterize for self-validation.

I had offered anyone a bet that Obama would win the general election. One idiot-boy wanted the bet to include me taking a bogus Internet political compass test. I don't do pet tricks. My proposed bet was for the loser to leave ET forever or for any length of time of their choosing. However, I wanted the moderator(s) to enforce by deleting any new user names consistent with the losing bettor's IP address or some such. Joe declined to participate. Therefore, I rescinded my offer, since it would be pointless without enforcement. When I was then accused of chickening out, I accepted the challenge of the bet. However, I had stated clearly and repeatedly, both before and after, that I would not do parlor or pet tricks such as taking bogus Internet political compass tests, to the satisfaction and amusement of a drooling acne-faced adolescent. The matter then became a little cause célèbre among a few like-minded imbeciles.

And there you have it. A non-event that preceded a series of lies by liars who lie.
 
Quote from 377OHMS:

Who the fuck are you and why are you talking to me?
Just put the moron, Indystink, on ignore. He is more full of shit than RCG, just look at the crap he has posted today. He is just another Marxist liberal who doesn't have a clue.
 
Quote from Brass:

I never failed to "pay off or something." But people who have nothing must fabricate and mischaracterize for self-validation.

I had offered anyone a bet that Obama would win the general election. One idiot-boy wanted the bet to include me taking a bogus Internet political compass test. I don't do pet tricks. My proposed bet was for the loser to leave ET forever or for any length of time of their choosing. However, I wanted the moderator(s) to enforce by deleting any new user names consistent with the losing bettor's IP address or some such. Joe declined to participate. Therefore, I rescinded my offer, since it would be pointless without enforcement. When I was then accused of chickening out, I accepted the challenge of the bet. However, I had stated clearly and repeatedly, both before and after, that I would not do parlor or pet tricks such as taking bogus Internet political compass tests, to the satisfaction and amusement of a drooling acne-faced adolescent. The matter then became a little cause célèbre among a few like-minded imbeciles.

And there you have it. A non-event that preceded a series of lies by liars who lie.

OK, fair enough.
 
Quote from indythink75:

51212 - perfect example. Same two, but still wonder about the ignore thing. Why are people afraid of words?

"Who the fuck are you and why are you talking to me? "
 
Quote from indythink75:

Noted response. I was pretty clear in the assignment. I believe you mentioned another poster, Brass, failed to pay off or something. As I said, this is just an academic indulgence. Trying to help my brother.

Trying to help what?

Do you think I don't know the difference between a legitimate academic study and the made-up psychopathic horseshit you've been shoveling this morning?

You underestimate me sir.

Run along now. There are small minds in here that will welcome your attention and happily consume your time.
 
Quote from 377OHMS:

Trying to help what?

Do you think I don't know the difference between a legitimate academic study and the made-up psychopathic horseshit you've been shoveling this morning?

You underestimate me sir.

Run along now. There are small minds in here that will welcome your attention and happily consume your time.
I've seen the ruse of "academic study too".
A true academic would know interacting with your subject of study would invalidate any information gleaned.

Or maybe things have changed since I went to college.
 
Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:


A true academic would know interacting with your subject of study would invalidate any information gleaned.

Hmm, looks like indystink has been busted.
 
Back
Top