Romney 48% Obama 43%

Quote from bigarrow:

It will be pleasant watching the righties cry when Obama wins.
For the radical Christians it'll be a great weeping and gnashing of teeth.
I sure hope he wins.
I care more about the future of our country than gloating over the other teams loss. So I'm hoping for real change. Of course we're not going to get it, regardless of who wins.
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

...I want to really see where this country is at. I want a Santorum up there, so he can be crushed, and these social conservative idiots can finally go away, for good.
They'll never go away for good. They're too dumb to die.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

I care more about the future of our country than gloating over the other teams loss...
No you don't. You're just a shuffled deck of disjointed sound bites and drive-by smirks with absolutely no content or redeeming value. You have not even a rudimentary comprehension of the potential implications of your favorite sound bites. You just pretend to get pious and high-minded when the spirit moves you, meaning you might score an imaginary point or two.
 
Quote from Max E. Pad:

You keep on attacking conservatives based on Santorum, and what you have said, about wanting to see social conservatism on trial is actually a line that Lawrence Odonnell has been pushing.

I am not going to say that you are "copying" ODonell, as we have been able to have civil discourse tonight, but i will say this.

Mitt Romney is not a social conservative, nor is he a small government conservative,(though he is pretending to be about small government) and everyone knows that.

So if Santorum was in any way representative of the republican party as a whole, why is it that he cant gain any traction even though Romney is one of the most unpopular republicans in history?

If Santorum, and his craziness was an accurate representation of where Republicans stand overall, then why is it he cant even beat a moderate like Mitt Romney, who republicans dont even like, and the tea party hates?

There is a much larger number of (libertarians) socially liberal, fiscally conservative people like myself than you guys want to admit.

The fact is most people on the right these days care much more about the size/scope of government, than any of these social issues, and the media is the one who is painting the false narrative that somehow a nut like Santorum represents the entire party. You are pretending Santorum is representative of the party, when really the only person i can think of who is that far out on this site is Peil.


I like Maddow better, but it would make sense if O'Donnel were saying this.

I disagree with the social liberal aspect tho. If this were the case Mittens would have this thing wrapped. He is clearly a social liberal and that is what the GOP seems to hate. That is what I am observing. No one I know is arguing that we need to do something about the fiscal aspect of government, but this other stuff is going to sink them, I will watch more O'Donnell to see what is going on with him.
 
Quote from Brass:

No you don't. You're just a shuffled deck of disjointed sound bites and drive-by smirks with absolutely no content or redeeming value. You have not even a rudimentary comprehension of the potential implications of your favorite sound bites. You just pretend to get pious and high-minded when the spirit moves you, meaning you might score an imaginary point or two.

I can only imagine how tight the knot in your panties must get when you think of me having a vote in the political process you are so utterly obsessed with whilst you are but a distant totally irrelevant observer.


:D
 
Quote from Brass:

They'll never go away for good. They're too dumb to die.

Who, the Canadian busy bodies who won't mind their own business?
 
Quote from Lucrum:

I can only imagine how tight the knot in your panties must get when you think of me having a vote in the political process you are so utterly obsessed with whilst you are but a distant totally irrelevant observer.


:D
First, I don't think about you any more than I think about, say, an annoying grease stain. Second, don't automatically assume that everyone else wears your own personal choice of undergarments. And third, I hope you spend hours in traffic and then in the queue to vote. Then it will be that much more irksome for you when Obama wins. Again. Me? I'll just watch the annoying grease stains dissolve and wash away. Until the next time.
 
Quote from Brass:

First, I don't think about you any more than I think about, say, an annoying grease stain.
Change your panties more often gayfly, then you won't have that problem.
...And third, I hope you spend hours in traffic and then in the queue to vote...
More wishful thinking on your part. It took maybe 12 mins to drive to and maybe 3 mins to vote in the Primary. The benefit of living well outside over crowded cities. Odumbo winning a second term, while very disappointing, will not be a shock to me. There are just too many stupid people in the world, like you for example.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

I can only imagine how tight the knot in your panties must get when you think of me having a vote in the political process you are so utterly obsessed with whilst you are but a distant totally irrelevant observer.


:D
+100 :D
 
Back
Top