Robinhood options errors

Cheat the system? So I send the order to TOS and pay per ticket charge plus per contract charge and ToS will send the order to same Citadel and will get a kick back from them too!? So they will f@#$ me on both ends!? Tell me please why sending a limit order for free is a bad deal? If you have access to technology to direct your orders you are simply playing whole different game, that's all.

Think of it as playing poker with your cards facing the table. You are showing your hand to the HFTs purchasing your flow. They can lean on your order to trade in front and scalp around it knowing their downside is just your limit if the market goes against them. This also means you may miss fills as others trade ahead of you and giving up a good chance at price improvement if available.
 
Think of it as playing poker with your cards facing the table. You are showing your hand to the HFTs purchasing your flow. They can lean on your order to trade in front and scalp around it knowing their downside is just your limit if the market goes against them. This also means you may miss fills as others trade ahead of you and giving up a good chance at price improvement if available.

You lose on potential price improvement but gain on the definitely lower commissions.

Further, if you are a profitable trader, wouldn’t you want to be lumped in the bucket of people who are considered unprofitable? Retail order flow is sold because the customers are statistically unprofitable. Why highlight your trading prowess by accessing the market directly?
 
They can lean on your order to trade in front and scalp around it knowing their downside is just your limit if the market goes against them.
If you are trading size that HFTs can lean on then: 1. You are not using any retail platform; 2. You are breaking/working your orders.
You are playing a completely different (professional?) game. But if you are a piker (like most of us here), you don't have access to technology (Colo+speed) to circumvent/outsmart HFTs/MMs. Give me an example of a retail platform where you think you will avoid HFTs with your internet connection. What kind of strategy are you running that requires you to complete with HFTs/MMs anyway?
 
Retail order flow is sold because the customers are statistically unprofitable.
I would not categorize it like that (although it is not wrong either). I would call it riskless to the MM. @Robert Morse would know more, but I would say that MM will make money either you are statistically profitable or not. As long as your timeframe is longer than a few seconds, you should not be concerned about HFTs/MMs, imho. Now if your strategy requires re-price every time underlying ticks, you should definitely not use RH.
 
I would call it riskless to the MM. @Robert Morse would know more,

I assume we are still talking about Listed Options. I would call all market orders of any kind that is not a "pick off", to many to define, good order flow that a MM can make money off. There is too much focus in forums on what your counterparty will get from your order and not enough focus on finding an edge. WIth us, you either want to use our SMART route to avoid Maker-Taker fees or want to direct your order to have control over what exchange you hit and what those fees or rebates are. If it were me, I would want the choice, but I would make my default SMART.
 
Robinhood is making money from selling order flow and has big backers who can cover losses, probably even up to $1B. But losses shouldn’t be that big if they recalculate proper option values and adjust the accounts, with some credit to customers.
While the more they lose the more money will those lucky Robinhood users make, so not sure why MarkBrown is saying “it’s your fault”. Your fault that you won lottery and Robinhood lost money?
While it’s possible that nobody loses or wins much.

In terms of offering 3% interest, there is no way they could simply pull this out of a hat in a day, without spending months preparing. !”.

Snake oil!

https://www.newsmax.com/finance/per...vings-bank/2018/12/20/id/895303/?oRef=taboola

:sneaky:
 
Back
Top