Quote from Rearden Metal:
Ok, here we go again:
Long ZSL with 75% of max buying power, right here, right now.
ZSL current price: 12.86.
Time frame: 1-3 days.
Regarding Echo: I can no longer recommend them. My main problem with Echo was their increasingly tight, often illogical risk control. When I set up shop with them in 2003, there were no max share caps at all- I basically had a free hand to go up to 30-1 leveraged intra-day and 5-1 overnight. But about three years ago they instituted max share caps- They set the software to disallow large positions in any individual stock or ETF. These share caps became increasingly restrictive until I finally parted ways with the firm a year ago. On very low priced stocks (2-4$ stocks like Citi) I wasn't even permitted <b>retail Reg-T margin</b> without special permission. There was also a difference of opinion on what should be done when I'm caught in bad positions and my unrealized account balance went red. I wanted the ability to ride it out and exit when I saw fit, while Echo was most concerned about the hypothetical possibility of me blowing up my account plus taking it deep into the red. They saw fit to forcibly liquidate all my positions in such situations, even though I had the ability to wire in sufficient funds the next day to cover any negative balances I may have caused.
The way I saw it, I was an asset to Echo. I was paying (gross) over 1/2 mil/year in commissions, and steering <b>many</b> ET members their way. The way they saw it, the theoretical possibility that I might blow up all of my money plus some of theirs (just two or three months worth of the commissions I was paying at the time), and then <i>not</i> pay them what was owed by immediately bringing my account balance back up to at least $0 (even though I would have never done that... there's no way I'd have ever stiffed them out of a single penny owed in the event my balance went negative. I always had other liquid assets on hand to replenish my trading account should I ever blow it up)- well, that was <i>their</i> primary concern, and they took many steps to restrict my trading to avoid such a hypothetical situation from ever occurring, and it totally cramped my style. I'm not saying I was right, or that they were... we just had an insurmountable difference of opinion. I thought I was a big enough asset to the firm to be granted a little leeway, and they just refused to see it that way.
Quote from Rearden Metal:
Ok, here we go again:
Long ZSL with 75% of max buying power, right here, right now.
ZSL current price: 12.86.
Time frame: 1-3 days.
Regarding Echo: I can no longer recommend them. My main problem with Echo was their increasingly tight, often illogical risk control. When I set up shop with them in 2003, there were no max share caps at all- I basically had a free hand to go up to 30-1 leveraged intra-day and 5-1 overnight. But about three years ago they instituted max share caps- They set the software to disallow large positions in any individual stock or ETF. These share caps became increasingly restrictive until I finally parted ways with the firm a year ago. On very low priced stocks (2-4$ stocks like Citi) I wasn't even permitted <b>retail Reg-T margin</b> without special permission. There was also a difference of opinion on what should be done when I'm caught in bad positions and my unrealized account balance went red. I wanted the ability to ride it out and exit when I saw fit, while Echo was most concerned about the hypothetical possibility of me blowing up my account plus taking it deep into the red. They saw fit to forcibly liquidate all my positions in such situations, even though I had the ability to wire in sufficient funds the next day to cover any negative balances I may have caused.
The way I saw it, I was an asset to Echo. I was paying (gross) over 1/2 mil/year in commissions, and steering <b>many</b> ET members their way. The way they saw it, the theoretical possibility that I might blow up all of my money plus some of theirs (just two or three months worth of the commissions I was paying at the time), and then <i>not</i> pay them what was owed by immediately bringing my account balance back up to at least $0 (even though I would have never done that... there's no way I'd have ever stiffed them out of a single penny owed in the event my balance went negative. I always had other liquid assets on hand to replenish my trading account should I ever blow it up)- well, that was <i>their</i> primary concern, and they took many steps to restrict my trading to avoid such a hypothetical situation from ever occurring, and it totally cramped my style. I'm not saying I was right, or that they were... we just had an insurmountable difference of opinion. I thought I was a big enough asset to the firm to be granted a little leeway, and they just refused to see it that way.
Quote from Rearden Metal:
<i>So you really put 75% of your net worth in ZSL?</i>
---->That's not what I said.
Quote from retaildaytrader:
Wait a second. You said you put "75% of buying power" into the ZSL, but now you are going back on what you said? If silver wasnt tanking like it is today then would you reply back differently? Lemme guess, you got more in your onsite gold and silver vault.
I'm being a little hard because someone might be trying to mimic your trades here and I dont want anyone to get ambushed as a result of a publicity stunt on your part. This isnt really a journal, but a chance for you to tell your story. Ok then, why not post a real thread so you can chit-chat about yourself? That way, no one will get ambushed.
Quote from Rearden Metal:
You can't possibly fathom how 75% of max buying power isn't the same thing as 75% of my entire net worth, so you therefore assume that I'm now 'going back on what I said'?
Interesting... and that would be <i>your</i> (reading comprehension) problem, not mine.
Anybody else have any ignorant, baseless assumptions they'd like to pollute this thread with, or are we done for now?