Quote from momoneythansens:
I think one way to think about it, or at least the way I think about it is that the intention is to leg in to/convert to the limited risk fly for less than fair value or "build expectancy" etc.
This is achieved by assuming some risk for a period of time and earning theta both on the short straddle as well as getting into the long strangle for less or by favourable skew slope activity etc.
I personally didn't see it as a negative gamma scalping strategy as you suggest.
Just re-iterating this for my own benefit! I'm sure riskarb will give a more accurate summary in his inimitable style.
MoMoney.

Quote from man:
ok. bb is a strange thing. like an ad-show. teases you in the first place, disappoints you once you have it ....
are you going to track some equity urve or something along with the journal?
Quote from momoneythansens:
Phil,
I think one way to think about it, or at least the way I think about it is that the intention is to leg in to/convert to the limited risk fly for less than fair value or "build expectancy" etc.
This is achieved by assuming some risk for a period of time and earning theta both on the short straddle as well as getting into the long strangle for less or by favourable skew slope activity etc.
I personally didn't see it as a negative gamma scalping strategy as you suggest.
Just re-iterating this for my own benefit! I'm sure riskarb will give a more accurate summary in his inimitable style.
MoMoney.
Quote from optioncoach:
Mo:
I did nto mean to suggest a negative gamma scalp really. I thought the intention was to sell the straddle and gain theta and perhaps IV decay, add the wings as the market moves to hedge and rebalance.
What it appears to be, in English, is to leg into the I-Fly as the underlying moves in one direction by simply buying the one side? Using risk-based haircut you get a cheap FLY compared to if you opened the whole position outright from the beginning? Thus locking in a profit on one side. If the stock reverses and moves back lower you get more wasted movement in the underlying and thus more theta....?