Averaging down is making the average entry price go down. But the price, actual traded price, (which is more important than average price of entry) is going doooooooown not up why add?
Because it might turn around?
I'm no expert with sizing algos, but here are the obvious levels in a trend following equity curve where leverage could be added and pyramiding could take place with little added risk. You could also "average down" the equity curve in the range bound regions, but I never tested this.....
I heard of this thing, but when you're doing scalping then this averaging seems a little bit off as positions are for very short term and usually closed before opening other. Right?If you add while prices go down, your average price gets lower. You can do this if you are convinced that prices will go up again later. If that's the case, averaging down improves your profits. If prices don't go up later, you made your losses bigger.
If you are not convinced you just get out.
I heard of this thing, but when you're doing scalping then this averaging seems a little bit off as positions are for very short term and usually closed before opening other. Right?
I daytrade but keep positions sometimes even hours, so I don't use this technique.
The only thing I sometimes do is double my position when the first position is profitable.
I only double if I have a clear signal of a retracement. These signals have a +90% success rate but are rare. The profit of this second position is of course smaller as the entry is worse than the first entry. But these additonal profits can add up quickly if compounding is used.
Exact same experience.I traded far better in my first month in the market before learning anything, because I had a true fear of the unknown, knew I couldn't calculate the future.
Later I read some books and thought I could see the order of the markets, and even the universe, according to the wave theorists who use fibonacci numbers. I wasted years looking for accuracy in the entry.