RIP Huntergate Oct 20, 2020 - Oct 23, 2020

https://dailycaller.com/2020/10/29/cybersecurity-expert-authenticates-hunter-biden-burisma-email/

EXCLUSIVE: NY Post’s ‘Smoking Gun’ Hunter Biden Email 100% Authentic, Forensic Analysis Concludes

An email Hunter Biden received in April 2015 from a Burisma executive discussing an introduction to then-Vice President Joe Biden, which lies at the heart of a New York Post investigation, is unquestionably authentic, a cybersecurity expert told the Daily Caller News Foundation on Thursday.

The DCNF obtained a full copy of Hunter Biden’s alleged laptop from former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani on Wednesday. The DCNF provided Robert Graham, the founder of the cybersecurity firm Errata Security, with a copy of the email and its metadata for forensic analysis.

Graham, who has been cited as a cybersecurity expert in The Washington Post, the Associated Press, Wired, Engadget and other news and technology outlets, told the DCNF that he used a cryptographic signature found in the email’s metadata to validate that Vadym Pozharsky, an advisor to Burisma’s board of directors, emailed Hunter Biden on April 17, 2015.

EXCLUSIVE: Right wing morons don't understand what DKIM is

The purpose of a DKIM signature is to verify the email came from an email address at a specific domain, to combat spoofed emails. It does NOT prove the content of the email was unaltered or authentic. That’s a different kind of signature, and calling DKIM a “cryptographic” signature seems like a purposeful attempt to conflate the two.

"It means an email of exactly the text above (it cannot be altered) was sent by Pozharskyi to Hunter Biden on Friday the 17th of April , 2015."

No it doesn't.

The DKIM signature verifies that the date field wasn't modified after being sent. However when you send an email you can set the Date field to anything you'd like, DKIM will not validate that it is the correct date.

So we can say that we verified the email was sent between 2012 and 2016 but not the exact date.


"It appears that Hunter introduced Joe to energy executives in the Ukraine while being paid by these executives when Joe Biden was Vice President of the United States."


Appearances can be deceiving. A single email without further context isn't enough evidence to prove anything illegal took place. It would certainly be great if they released the metadata for the rest of the emails.
 
EXCLUSIVE: Right wing morons don't understand what DKIM is

The purpose of a DKIM signature is to verify the email came from an email address at a specific domain, to combat spoofed emails. It does NOT prove the content of the email was unaltered or authentic. That’s a different kind of signature, and calling DKIM a “cryptographic” signature seems like a purposeful attempt to conflate the two.

"It means an email of exactly the text above (it cannot be altered) was sent by Pozharskyi to Hunter Biden on Friday the 17th of April , 2015."

No it doesn't.

The DKIM signature verifies that the date field wasn't modified after being sent. However when you send an email you can set the Date field to anything you'd like, DKIM will not validate that it is the correct date.

So we can say that we verified the email was sent between 2012 and 2016 but not the exact date.


"It appears that Hunter introduced Joe to energy executives in the Ukraine while being paid by these executives when Joe Biden was Vice President of the United States."


Appearances can be deceiving. A single email without further context isn't enough evidence to prove anything illegal took place. It would certainly be great if they released the metadata for the rest of the emails.
So, what you are attempting to convey is that there is no way to ever authenticate an email. An email can never ever be used as evidence in a court of law.

This is a great example of the Ministry of Truth. Fucking bat shit crazy.

Spin, spin, spin, spin...
 
So, what you are attempting to convey is that there is no way to ever authenticate an email. An email can never ever be used as evidence in a court of law.

This is a great example of the Ministry of Truth. Fucking bat shit crazy.

Spin, spin, spin, spin...

There is a very very simple way to authenticate the email - simply dump all the emails with metadata like wikileaks did and it will get authenticated within hours.

The fact that you guys on relying on some 'cybersecurity' expert with a defunct website trying to authenticate using DKIM when you dont even understand what it is proves that right wingers are pea brains.

There is nothing to spin, keep crying about Hunter, nobody gives a shit especially with all your fake news Russian disinformation.
 
You should lobby for the NSA to be shutdown. According to you, nothing that is digital can be authenticated so there is not need for the NSA.

Did anyone call Wikileaks email dump fake? No. It was called hacked but nobody doubted its authenticity.

Why won't Ghouliani and the Trump campaign dump Hunter email leaks in the public domain? Because they are fake.
 
Did anyone call Wikileaks email dump fake? No. It was called hacked but nobody doubted its authenticity.

Why won't Ghouliani and the Trump campaign dump Hunter email leaks in the public domain? Because they are fake.
Warning...Warning. The Ministry of Truth is making an announcement.

Meanwhile......

hunter-Copy.jpg
 
Warning...Warning. The Ministry of Truth is making an announcement.

Meanwhile......

hunter-Copy.jpg

So what is your point? 50 million will vote Trump and millions will search for Hunter Biden, what does that prove?

People won't vote for Joe Biden because his son did business with foreigners while Joe Biden was VP and switch their votes to Trump who himself along with family does business worth millions with foreigners while getting millions from taxpayers? What is even the angle here?

Again, wait 4 days, even Trump knows he is losing when he cancelled his victory party. You should accept it too and stop beating the dead horse. Even Cucker Carlson gave up.
 
According to a new NBC News story, Ken Dilanian and Tom Winter, who cover national security and corruption for the network, respectively, made numerous attempts to confirm and vet the claims made by Rudy Giuliani and Tony Bobulinski. But they were never granted sufficient access to further interrogate the ambiguous allegations leveled at Biden and his father, 2020 Democratic challenger Joe Biden.

In the weeks since the New York Post first published a story about materials from an allegedly abandoned Hunter Biden laptop, the Trump campaign has complained that mainstream media outlets have intentionally avoided reporting out stories connected to Joe Biden’s son and possible corruption.

“Both the Wall Street Journal and Fox News — among the only news organizations that have been given access to key documents — found that the emails and other records don’t make that case,” Dilanian and Winter noted, regarding the specific allegation of the former vice president being involved in his business dealings. They then detailed their similar outreach, but had little success.

“An NBC News correspondent asked Bobulinski for an interview and for copies of documents in his possession, but he declined,” the story explained. Instead, Bobulinski told NBC to watch Fox News’ opinion host Tucker Carlson’s interview with him on Tuesday.

Likewise, attempts to get first-hand access to the alleged Hunter Biden emails and laptop ran into obstacles. Giuliani’s lawyer, Robert Costello, did grant NBC News some ability to review some of the materials, but did now allow the reporters to do a formal forensic analysis of them.

It was Giuliani who ultimately told NBC News he would not be providing a copy of the hard drive. NBC News responded by asking if, instead of a full copy of the hard drive, he could just provide copies of the full set of emails. Giuliani did not agree to that proposal. NBC News then declined an offer of copies of a small group of emails.

NBC News also attempted to interview the computer store owner, John Paul Mac Isaac, who purportedly turned over a copy of the Hunter Biden laptop hard drive to Giuliani and the FBI. He did not respond.
 
Back
Top