Quote from bebpasco:
Tough to give results in a spread format because of the long Jun 80Cs and the extra Jul puts. Closed out the position with avg IV (p&c) in the 53.5% range. Profit of $2,412 less comm. Left 10% on the table because IV has dropped currently to an avg of 52%.
The basic 75 put calendar was a better play --- even with the drop in Jul IV to the low 50s. The problem with the long calendar is the risk profile if there was a substantial move, either way, in the stock. It all depends on your comfort zone.
It's a given that the kicker is likely to be a waste of money because it's expiring imminently. Normally, I'd use an OTM strike as a kicker unless like in this position, the legs are seriously OTM to start with. I used the 85c as the kicker because the premium for the 80c bot several 85's and the net "W" could be balanced for a lower cost. Good trade!Quote from bebpasco:
Could have used Jun 85Cs or Jul 85Cs but liked the risk profile better with the Jun 80s. Also, had an upwards basis on the stock. Turns out, the 80Cs were a waste of money.
Agree, this dbl RC suffers as the price approaches the strikes. If the underlying stays in the range indicated in my last post, you get a nice return if IV cooperates. A move past the strikes also has a nice return but different magnitude.
You're over my head on the last paragraph. Bring the explanation down to a level that most of us can understand. [/B]
Kedwards,Quote from Kedwards:
I papertraded a 85/65 position yesterday, here's the risk profile today.
Quote from spindr0:
It's a given that the kicker is likely to be a waste of money because it's expiring imminently. Normally, I'd use an OTM strike as a kicker unless like in this position, the legs are seriously OTM to start with. I used the 85c as the kicker because the premium for the 80c bot several 85's and the net "W" could be balanced for a lower cost. Good trade!