Right wingers have a meltdown as Mueller starts rounding up Trump criminals

Max E. said:
LOL, because its just ridiculous, if your not willing to accept well established facts its not my problem, and i have no interest in having a debate over something so stupid. If you want to walk around with your head up your ass thats on you.
More...

You keep calling them facts but are unable to point to them.

I asked a very simple question, how did a CANADIAN who had NO stake in Uranium One when that CANADIAN company was sold off to Russians become HILLARY GOT MONEY FROM RUSSIANS?

Which Russians did Hillary get money from? I can show you which Russians Manafort got money from if you ask me for a source, why can't you do the same for your claim.

See, this is why Mueller is indicting Trump's people while you are going on and on about whataboutism.
 
you are so full of shit once again.
there is at least one lie in almost everyone of your posts.

and go to hell with your pedo shit.
you need to stop with that deranged shit.

and you know damn well know I don't think trump is doing that good a job.
how many times do I have to tell you that.

basically he has had 2 good weeks in 10 months.

so stop lying your ass off you troll.

exGOPer said:
And here comes Mr. Peer Review known for posting fake papers trying to pass it as scientific.

As usual, nothing but ad hominem attacks from the resident scientist who can't tell a fake sceintific paper from a real one but is a legend in his own mind.

Now go back to worshipping your pedo child rapist messiah and the RNC cult of Breitbart and Fox News stooges.
More...
 
that is not legal precedent in our system.
in general criminal or trial court judgement do not rise to legal precedent.
precedent come from courts of higher authority.
ignorant lefties mouthing off about the law when they are just spewing ignorant talking points.

exGOPer said:
For a precedent to be established in the legal system, there has to be an indictment, a trial and then a judgement - when you don't have evidence to even start an investigation then what is the basis for a precedent?

Why don't you prove that Hillary took money from Russians first, why do you keep evading that question? The individuals you keep calling Russians are actually Canadian and American - and that's precisely why Trump's DOJ didn't even initiate an investigation into Hillary while the very same DOJ is readying indictments relating to Trump's campaign.
More...
 
jem said:
that is not legal precedent in our system.
in general criminal or trial court judgement do not rise to legal precedent.
precedent come from courts of higher authority.
ignorant lefties mouthing off about the law when they are just spewing ignorant talking points.
More...

What are you babbling about? The whole point is that there is not even a case against Clinton to discuss a precedent, whoever said anything about higher or lower courts when no courts are involved at all since there is no case or even an investigation.
 
jem said:
you are so full of shit once again.
there is at least one lie in almost everyone of your posts.

and go to hell with your pedo shit.
you need to stop with that deranged shit.

and you know damn well know I don't think trump is doing that good a job.
how many times do I have to tell you that.

basically he has had 2 good weeks in 10 months.

so stop lying your ass off you troll.
More...

Trump is not a pedo?

Here he is sexualizing a 10 year old
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...ropriate-remarks-about-10-year-old-girl-video

Here he is sexualizing a 14 year old
http://www.latimes.com/nation/polit...ting-underage-girls-1476377294-htmlstory.html


Here he is trying to see 15 year olds naked
http://people.com/politics/donald-trump-walks-in-miss-teen-usa-contestants-changing/

Here is the rape allegation with WITNESS statement of a 13 year old
https://splinternews.com/here-are-all-the-times-donald-trump-has-been-accused-of-1793860459

Do you want more?

If this doesnt make him a pedo, what does? People have been called worse for looking at pervy pictures of underage girls, this guy goes into a changing room trying to see children naked but that gets a pass? Why?

What did I lie about here?
 
exGOPer said:
Trump is not a pedo?

Here he is sexualizing a 10 year old
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...ropriate-remarks-about-10-year-old-girl-video

Here he is sexualizing a 14 year old
http://www.latimes.com/nation/polit...ting-underage-girls-1476377294-htmlstory.html


Here he is trying to see 15 year olds naked
http://people.com/politics/donald-trump-walks-in-miss-teen-usa-contestants-changing/

Here is the rape allegation with WITNESS statement of a 13 year old
https://splinternews.com/here-are-all-the-times-donald-trump-has-been-accused-of-1793860459

Do you want more?

If this doesnt make him a pedo, what does? People have been called worse for looking at pervy pictures of underage girls, this guy goes into a changing room trying to see children naked but that gets a pass? Why?

What did I lie about here?
More...

They don't mind/register his doing this as they would themselves given the opportunity is one explanation.

There is something sexually sleazy about the extreme con brain, they are letchy pervs. Yet again yesterday Fox had another front page story about a female teacher who has sex with a student. There must be a dozen or more cases a day of male teacher with girls across the nation but Fox only cares about one thing.

This is because the Fox readers click on those stories of course.

upload_2017-10-28_15-30-1.png


Jerry Springer himself weighs in.
 
Slartibartfast said:
They don't mind/register his doing this as they would themselves given the opportunity is one explanation.

There is something sexually sleazy about the extreme con brain, they are letchy pervs. Yet again yesterday Fox had another front page story about a female teacher who has sex with a student. There must be a dozen or more cases a day of male teacher with girls across the nation but Fox only cares about one thing.

This is because the Fox readers click on those stories of course.

View attachment 179112

Jerry Springer himself weighs in.
More...

That reminds me, Fox News paid O'reilly's accuser 32 million to settle a lawsuit

WTF do you have to do to get 32 million? I can't even imagine what OReilly did to that woman.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top