Something else to consider. --Rhode Island is an incredibly small state and it has 1500 square miles. Now, you want to make a state out of fewer than 70 square miles?====No way
Does The Construction set a minimum size of a state?
Something else to consider. --Rhode Island is an incredibly small state and it has 1500 square miles. Now, you want to make a state out of fewer than 70 square miles?====No way
Something else to consider. --Rhode Island is an incredibly small state and it has 1500 square miles. Now, you want to make a state out of fewer than 70 square miles?====No way
Correct, but now you are going to want the new state and DC both to have Electors and that can't fly.
Correct.DC itself would not be a state.
As you can see here, the language of the 23rd Amendment states "if it were a state", thus a constitutional amendment would be needed to correct this if the land outside The Fed buildings etc were to be made a state. It can't be done with just legislation. The only move would be to incorporate these areas back into Maryland as was done with land retroceded back to Virginia before. If that was done though, you would still need a constitutional amendment to remove the Electors allotted to the district as several hundred people would now have too much power in The Electoral College.
You might see large states donating 10 square miles to make a new state
Just to get more senators to offset the new DC Senators
This is what happens when things are done for politics....
But not land mass. And it is obviously a political ploy to seize more power. If it was just about representation, you would be in favor of incorporating the areas back into Maryland.The new state surrounding DC would have a higher population than Wyoming.
Correct.
As I indicated, land was ceded back to Virginia.Congress has the authority to redefine the borders of the federal district.It did so in 1846.