Richard Dawkins, Famed Atheist, Supports Free Bibles In Schools

[stu]

Quote from jem:
The point is Weinberg just told you the universe is fine tuned and science may never be able to explain it.

Stephen Weinberg states
"I don't think it requires a fine tuning of the constants of nature."

Quote from jem:

Man you are a troll moron.
That is 9 minutes of brilliance on this subject.
You falsely attribute the statements about the speculative multiverse idea... to fine tuning.

He explains how finely tuned dark energy is.
He explains that ... the multiverse is the best explanation in hopes of explaining a natural reason for fine tuning but also touches on another.

And yet you come back with your out of context crap in which weinberg argues whether carbon is fine tuned.

You are the worst kind of troll. You lie misrepresent the words of a nobel prize winner off a video.

Stephen Weinberg states
"I don't think it requires a fine tuning of the constants of nature."



You're missing something, it's known as rationality but like I say, you are religiously delusional and it obviously distorts your reasoning out of all proportion.

 

[jem]

put it in context... when he tells dawkins there may never be an explanation for why our constants are tuned for life and dawkins has that oh shit moment in the video.

Weinberg is telling the truth and you are such a troll you are trying to excise one sentence and pull it out of context.

Even your greifer friends will have to downgrade you for that.

Quote from stu:

Stephen Weinberg states
"I don't think it requires a fine tuning of the constants of nature."






Stephen Weinberg states
"I don't think it requires a fine tuning of the constants of nature."



You're missing something, it's known as rationality but like I say, you are religiously delusional and it obviously distorts your reasoning out of all proportion.

 

[jem]

Quote from Free Thinker:

lets hear your best. i bet jezus would be proud. only question i have is why do all the bible thumpers on et so easily resort to profanity? where is that trader666 guy anyhow?
the skeptics usually use calm reasoned arguments with a little riddicule to get attention.
maybe its because since you are told to believe with "childlike faith"you also have childlike emotions. what do you think?

yeah you are real reasoned. For that last 5 years you have been pretending that no scientists state the universe appears designed, even though I present you videos and papers from the tip minds in physics and cosmology.

Did you watch the video Stu just linked to? did you hear what a Nobel prize winner had to say.

As far as cursing... do you curse? If you do not I respect your discipline.

Do you think Jesus (why are you afraid to spell his name correctly) cares if I curse on elitetrader?

You are one backwards fundamentalist aren't you?

Finally do you think God would judge me on my cursing?
Are you that afraid of God?

 

[Ricter]

You two remind me of that old Star Trek episode, the one where the two guys, each black on one side and white on the other, viciously, tirelessly battle their way across the galaxy, even endangering the Enterprise in the process. At one point Cap'n Kirk asks one why he hates the other one so much. The guy answers, "isn't it obvious? he is white on the left side of his body, I am black on that side".

 

[jem]

But its not a battle.

go to the video at 3 mins 40 seconds.

nobel prize winner saying there is one example of what appears to be fantastic fine tuning.

how these dipshits could be pretending there is no appearance of fine tuning to some top scientists... shows you how disingenuous some leftists are. (no offense)

Quote from Ricter:

You two remind me of that old Star Trek episode, the one where the two guys, each black on one side and white on the other, viciously, tirelessly battle their way across the galaxy, even endangering the Enterprise in the process. At one point Cap'n Kirk asks one why he hates the other one so much. The guy answers, "isn't it obvious? he is white on the left side of his body, I am black on that side".

 

[stu]

Quote from Ricter:

You two remind me of that old Star Trek episode, the one where the two guys, each black on one side and white on the other, viciously, tirelessly battle their way across the galaxy, even endangering the Enterprise in the process. At one point Cap'n Kirk asks one why he hates the other one so much. The guy answers, "isn't it obvious? he is white on the left side of his body, I am black on that side".

You remind me of someone with nothing to contribute.

 

[stu]

Quote from jem:

But its not a battle.

go to the video at 3 mins 40 seconds.

nobel prize winner saying there is one example of what appears to be fantastic fine tuning.

how these dipshits could be pretending there is no appearance of fine tuning to some top scientists... shows you how disingenuous some leftists are. (no offense)

Which part of the vid did you not hear Weinberg say ....

• "I don't think there's really any evidence of very precise fine tuning of the constants of nature."
  
  "Well, the fact that there is such an energy level at just that energy does not require a fine tuning of it "
  
  "I don't think it requires a fine tuning of the constants of nature."

....all of it?

Is your hearing impaired?

Quote from jem:

"Stu - if you were not abusive first.. I would not be abusive towards you."

...or are you just lying again.

 

[jem]

is your brain impaired - seriously are you sick?
watch it again... he is discussing the fine tuning of carbon. Dawkins injected Hoyles name.

Weinberg disputes that carbon and nucleosyntheis shows a fine tuning. But, right there that is proof some scientists argue for the appearance of fine tunings.

So you can stfu now. That is more proof some scientists say that our universe appears finely tuned.

But if you listen another seconds to 3 mins and 40 seconds this noble prize winner tells you about the appearance of a fantistic fine tuning.

So now you can stfu for all time on this issues.
Some great scientist state there is an appearance of fine tunings.. and it may or may not ever be explained.

Quote from stu:

Which part of the vid did you not hear Weinberg say ....

• "I don't think there's really any evidence of very precise fine tuning of the constants of nature."
  
  "Well, the fact that there is such an energy level at just that energy does not require a fine tuning of it "
  
  "I don't think it requires a fine tuning of the constants of nature."

....all of it?

Is your hearing impaired?




...or are you just lying again.

 

[Ricter]

Quote from stu:

You remind me of someone with nothing to contribute.

Perhaps, but you two are "contributing" noise, that's all I meant.

 

[stu]

Quote from Ricter:

Perhaps, but you two are "contributing" noise, that's all I meant.

If you are not interested in the subject matter or the basic difference between right and wrong, then maybe it is noise to you.