Richard Clarke - Against All Enemies

I'm talking about someone that actually had intelligence in front of him well before 911 and had an opportunity to do something about it, via leadership.

Obviously, that person's name is George Bush.
He failed, and friend's of mine in the WTC died.
Period.
 
Quote from waggie945:

I'm talking about someone that actually had intelligence in front of him well before 911 and had an opportunity to do something about it, via leadership.
And I'm talking about a big mouthed politician, that actually had intelligence in front of him well before 911, who claims he has leadership, named John F'ing Kerry who ignored the warnings on security lapses at Logan when he had ample time to fix them. Period.
 
Quote from max401:

And I'm talking about a big mouthed politician, that actually had intelligence in front of him well before 911, who claims he has leadership, named John F'ing Kerry who ignored the warnings on security lapses at Logan when he had ample time to fix them. Period.

Since when airport security is Senator's responsibility. He promptly passed the information on to FAA and that was the best he could do, the airport security is FAA's prerogative. What else was he supposed to do, stand guard at the airport or what?

BTW 9/11 was not caused by airport security breaches anyway - the terrorists did not sneak in guns or bombs aboard the planes, knives only which was absolutely legal at the time.
 
Quote from dddooo:

BTW 9/11 was not caused by airport security breaches anyway - the terrorists did not sneak in guns or bombs aboard the planes, knives only which was absolutely legal at the time.

Well said. The airport security issue is a red herring.

To this day anyone can still legally and in plain sight get plenty of perfectly good shanks through airport security that are every bit as useful as those box cutters.

I travel ~200K miles a year domestically. I carry with me at all times an object that the xray machine can't see into. It is large enough that it could conceal multiple weapons (including multiple handguns, a sawed off shotgun AND a samurai sword simultaneously if so desired). In the past few years only twice (back closer to 9/11) have I been forced to check it. No more than 10 out of hundreds of passes through security has it been opened and searched. In NONE of those 10 was the search such that security would have even come CLOSE to finding said weapons had they existed. It is frightening how easy it is and would be to get both minor and major weapons on a plane.

Having said that, I'm not calling for El Al style security as it is not economically feasible and hijackers (at least in the US) will no more have the run of a plane as the passengers will not stand for it.

JB
 
Richard Clarke is a Jerkoff and anyone on this thread who doesn't see that is as well!

I wonder if he has a hidden agenda , like becoming a member of Kerry' team because he is pissed that he didn't get the job as Homeland Security Advisor??

He is a liar....................and it has been proven......just ask th e Senate Committee.

You Fuckin People that blame Bush make me friggen sick....He was in office 289 days upon 9-11.............Clinton was in office 8 FUCKIN YEARS!!!!!!!!!!

Lets talk about that LYING SAK of SHIT for a SECOND!
93 WTC BOMBING, USS COLE ATTACK, EMBASSY BOMBING in AFRICA( to which a movie has been made) CUTING the CIA and DEFENSE FUNDING. need I go on?

Oh but I am sorry I for got......you FUCKIN IDIOTS think BIN LADEN showed up on Sep 11.

But I guess you people think Bush should have insited a war his first days in office. So than you could bash him for that.

Anyone who thinks that IRAQ was/is not a threat is a bigger moron. That Maniac was trying to control the entire Middle East, why do you think the Saudi's wanted our help in 91? Because if he got through Kuwait they were next and they knew it!

Yes they harbor terrorism and we do business with them, But there is an old saying.........KEEP YOUR FRIENDS CLOSE and YOUR ENEMIES CLOSER!

You Dems flip/flop and will lie and say or do anything just to get your man in office! YOU MAKE ME SICK ...........because you don't think as an intellect!

You know 20/20 is heignsight and as traders you should know that.
It is so easy to point fingers and pass the buck after the fact

The fact is .............Clinton and Richard Clarke had 8 years to do something about this
 
Quote from waggie945:

I'm talking about someone that actually had intelligence in front of him well before 911 and had an opportunity to do something about it, via leadership.

Obviously, that person's name is George Bush.
He failed, and friend's of mine in the WTC died.
Period.

Sorry about your friends................but you need to get your facts straight.

Clinton and his team...............HAD 8 YEARS!
I am surprised..........because you usually have very intelligent things to say. Stop being so closed minded and look at the bigger picture on this one.
 
Quote from cuz:


You know 20/20 is heignsight and as traders you should know that.
It is so easy to point fingers and pass the buck after the fact

The fact is .............Clinton and Richard Clarke had 8 years to do something about this

I don't know about any body else, but you sure gave me something to think about. :confused:
 
Quote from dddooo:

Yeah, you wish. Like FBI, CIA, Pentagon, Congress, Senate and a bunch of other government orgranizations were not common denominator. Everybody knows that he was the biggest hawk in the government as far as fighting terrorism is concerned and constantly recommended more aggressive military responses.

But it's really not the point, it's not about Clarke. I do not know him, I do not care about him and have no interest in his fate, his views and his motives. It's about the administration.

He is a highly qualified professional and he testified under oath, that the administration was inept before 9/11 and was wrong to go to Iraq after 9/11.

Untill he's charged with purjury and convicted, or at least until Kindasleezy Rice testifies under oath to refute his testimony, until either of these two things happen - he is the one telling the truth and she is lying through her teeth.

Do your research buddy...................and just ask the Senate Committe about Richard Clarkes lies................IT IS a PROVEN FACT!
 
Quote from Error 404:

And this is relevant to the issue how? (Is there a quota on how many times Clinton's name needs to be invoked in every "defense" of Bush?).

R U FRIGGIN KIDDING ME????????????????

Relevant how????? That is the whole premise of this topic.

Clarke and Kerry and the rest of Dem party want to twist and distort the facts/truth..........just to gain power.

The fact is Clarke and CLINTON had 8 years to prevent this!
 
Quote from max401:

Let's point the finger at the person who is actually responsible:

Mr. Clarke has been involved in the fight against terrorism for the past decade. As 9-11 demonstrates, that decade was a period of growing peril, and unanswered attack, against the United States.

Mr. Clarke asserts that the United States could have stopped terrorism if only the three President's he served had better listened to his advice.

When Mr. Clarke was at the height of his influence as terrorism czar in the Clinton Administration, the United States saw:

first attack on the World Trade Center;

attack on a U.S. Air Force barracks in Saudi Arabia;

attack on two U.S. embassies in Africa;

attack on the USS Cole;

the planning and implementation for the 9-11 attack.

The only common denominator throughout these 10 years of unanswered attacks was:

Richard Clarke, himself,

a consideration that is clearly driving his effort to point fingers and shift blame.

After 10 years of policies that failed to decisively confront and eliminate the threat from Al Qaeda, Mr. Clarke now suggests that in its first seven months in office the Bush Administration is to blame

paraphrased from a speech by Sen. Bill Frist


BRAVO.........................MAX

At least someone other than me on this thread has a brain.............THAT ACTUALLY WORKS!
 
Back
Top